Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Golden Gate  (Read 1924 times)

William Walker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1134
    • William Walker Landscapes
Golden Gate
« on: April 02, 2014, 02:39:27 pm »

This is an old picture that I keep coming back to.

I hope you like it.

William
Logged
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." Christopher Hitchens

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2014, 03:25:12 pm »

I can see why. Very nice, William.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Tony Jay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2965
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2014, 04:02:20 pm »

Wow, this brings back memories!
It is a long time since I have been there.
Special image - and not just because of the memories.

Tony Jay
Logged

William Walker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1134
    • William Walker Landscapes
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2014, 07:20:03 am »

Thanks Guys!
Logged
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." Christopher Hitchens

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 687
    • BRATA
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2014, 12:51:31 pm »

The brightness of bushes and grass suggests a BW conversion.
Logged

William Walker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1134
    • William Walker Landscapes
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2014, 09:24:32 am »

The brightness of bushes and grass suggests a BW conversion.

I think you are right! I am quite happy with this...
Logged
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." Christopher Hitchens

David Eckels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3528
  • It's just a camera.
    • Website
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2014, 02:49:55 pm »

And you should be! Lovely.

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2014, 04:23:37 pm »

They're two completely different pictures, but both are good.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 812
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2014, 03:36:22 am »

Very nice, the light is lovely William, one doesn't often have this clarity down at the coast.

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2014, 05:23:50 am »

A nicely balanced composition which works well in both versions.

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2014, 02:27:04 am »

I'm not in love with the grasses in the foreground, but overall an excellent work.

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t

David Eckels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3528
  • It's just a camera.
    • Website
Re: Golden Gate
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2014, 09:01:12 am »

IMHO, the f/g grasses help give some depth as they meander back into the base of the cliff. The important is, if you're happy, be happy!
Pages: [1]   Go Up