Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Portrait prize  (Read 1236 times)

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296

petermfiore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2705
    • Peter Fiore Fine Art
Re: Portrait prize
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2014, 01:08:54 pm »

I like it. Would you care to go on the record?

Peter

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Re: Portrait prize
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2014, 02:46:14 pm »

I like the winner very much. The others are surprisingly diverse.

louoates

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
    • Lou Oates Photography
Re: Portrait prize
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2014, 05:44:42 pm »

Very good work. Makes me want to take more portraits.
Logged

wmchauncey

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 793
Re: Portrait prize
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2014, 08:43:20 am »

Funny...I always thought that a portrait photographer's goal was to make his subject appear somewhat attractive.
If my assumption is correct, then I would submit that these "artists" failed miserably...as well as the panel's judgment.
I would admit that sometimes the subject matter creates a chasm that any artist cannot dig fast enough to extricate himself from the pit.      ;D
Logged
The things you do for yourself die with

Bart_van_der_Wolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8914
Re: Portrait prize
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2014, 12:45:34 pm »

Funny...I always thought that a portrait photographer's goal was to make his subject appear somewhat attractive.

Hi,

Not really. A painting or other picture of a person, especially the head and shoulders, is all that's required to qualify. Of course, when shot in commission, making the subject look favorable may help getting paid, but it's more about capturing 'character' and personality. 

Cheers,
Bart
Logged
== If you do what you did, you'll get what you got. ==
Pages: [1]   Go Up