I started with the second generation 67 and loved it. I used it for a few years until I could find an excellent 67ii used on KEH. In more than a dozen years I doubt I shot handheld more than five or six times -- those classic "up" shots through the aspens, mostly. Mirror lock (always), cable or delayed release on 95% and my heavy-duty Gitzo, sometimes with my camera bag hanging from the hook. Most shots made at f16, f22, or more, depending on the lens, for depth of field with hyperfocus. Wonderful lenses optically, but slow. Working with fixed ISOs, almost exclusively 100 speed, meant shooting landscapes in the breezy mountain west sometimes required long intervals between shots waiting for the wind to subside. It was a dark day when I learned Fuji was no longer making 220 rolls for us: 120 requires changing too often. Despite all this, the 67ii is what I use, still, exclusively. I muse about having a "little" D800E and those dainty Nikkor lenses, along with multiple and high ISOs at any scene set-up, checking my shots as I take them, and not paying for drum scans -- BUT, I love what I get from my system: resolution and rendering. Seeing my chromes on a lightbox is a rush. Shooting MF film is an anachronistic pursuit these days, but there are rewards. If handling and changing film, and the delayed gratification can fit into your work flow, give it a try. MF 67 can be a rich complement to APS-C or even full-frame digital.