Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Unoccupied  (Read 2017 times)

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Unoccupied
« on: January 30, 2014, 04:20:56 pm »

Thoughts if any ??
Logged
One Day At A Time

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2014, 04:41:12 pm »

I allowed myself an edit.
Cheers
~Chris

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2014, 05:06:32 pm »

I allowed myself an edit.
Cheers
~Chris
Thanks Chris for the input. I wondered about going that direction with it.
Logged
One Day At A Time

WalterEG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2014, 05:25:11 pm »

I suspect it lives somewhere between the two.

Of the two seen here, I prefer the original.
Logged

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2014, 05:30:30 pm »

Version 2 with Chris' suggestions (as best as I can do anyway).
Logged
One Day At A Time

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2014, 07:10:50 pm »

I much prefer the original to any of the variants presented so far. The chimney and the remnant of the house/cabin are presented so well that they don't need any "enhancement" to create an artificial mood.

A while back I happened on a falling-down abandoned house in the woods, and I tried several shots, but I couldn't get anything as effective as this one. I like it a lot, Todd!
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2014, 07:15:44 pm »

I suspect it lives somewhere between the two.

+1

But I don't prefer the flat original. It ought to be possible in Photoshop or Lightroom to extend the tonal range without totally blocking the lows, but I think you'd have to work from the original raw.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2014, 11:14:34 pm »

Here is a third rendering taking into consideration everyone's suggestions. ?? 
Logged
One Day At A Time

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 812
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2014, 12:31:47 am »

I suspect it lives somewhere between the two.

Of the two seen here, I prefer the original.

Same here.

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2014, 03:36:23 am »

I suspect it lives somewhere between the two.

Of the two seen here, I prefer the original.

Me too.

Here is a third rendering taking into consideration everyone's suggestions. ?? 

This has a much more spacious feel to it, but some of the detail in the wood seems to have been lost.  ;)

Jeremy
Logged

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #10 on: January 31, 2014, 03:56:38 am »

Here is a third rendering taking into consideration everyone's suggestions. ?? 

Todd, you're messing up your threads ... ;)

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2014, 09:15:32 am »

In the words of Rosanna Danna......   nevermind
Logged
One Day At A Time

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2014, 10:31:00 am »

OK, this version has punch without looking over-dramatized.

Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #13 on: January 31, 2014, 03:37:39 pm »

+1. The last one is best of the bunch, Todd.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2014, 03:43:05 pm »

Great step forward.
Well done !

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #15 on: February 01, 2014, 04:25:11 am »

+1. The last one is best of the bunch, Todd.

I agree. I approve of your removing the white branch to the right of the stack, too.

Jeremy
Logged

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Unoccupied
« Reply #16 on: February 01, 2014, 08:58:00 am »

Thanks all for your help. I am learning so much from your input. Thank you, -todd
Logged
One Day At A Time
Pages: [1]   Go Up