Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sensor size v. Lens image height  (Read 948 times)

jrsforums

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1288
Sensor size v. Lens image height
« on: January 26, 2014, 05:23:28 pm »

Canon patents for 85mm, 100mm, & 135mm lens show a height of 21.635mm
http://www.canonwatch.com/canon-patent-image-stabilized-85mm-100mm-135mm-lenses/

I assume these lens were for "full frame", i.e. 35mm. 

However, I always thought the sensor size was 36mm x 24mm.

I am guessing I was wrong....or these lens are not for FF.

Any guidance?

John
Logged
John

BJL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6600
Re: Sensor size v. Lens image height
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2014, 09:17:03 am »

Canon patents for 85mm, 100mm, & 135mm lens show a height of 21.635mm
http://www.canonwatch.com/canon-patent-image-stabilized-85mm-100mm-135mm-lenses/

I assume these lens were for "full frame", i.e. 35mm.  

However, I always thought the sensor size was 36mm x 24mm.

I am guessing I was wrong....or these lens are not for FF.

Any guidance?

John
Here, "height" is strange optics jargon for "distance from the center of the image", as used in the labelling of lens MTF graphs. That 21.625mm is exactly half the diagonal length of a 36x24mm sensor, so is the distance from image center to the corner of the 36x24mm frame, and the maximum relevant "height" for an MTF graph.

TL;DR: these are lenses for the traditional 36x24mm format, aka "35mm".
« Last Edit: January 27, 2014, 04:10:43 pm by BJL »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up