Hi all,
so my trusted z3100 finally broke down. 6 years of very good service. I know it can be fixed, but i am not sure it is worth it. i have not kept up with the state of printing machines over last few years. What are the highest rated machines out there today if I wanted to buy a new one? The "new" Canons, are they worth it?
TIA,
Amnon
If all the z3100 needs is the belt, you need to do it yourself. It's not that big of a deal.
The #1 reason NOT to buy another HP z3200 is the cost of the inks. HP foolishly discontinued the twin packs, and I've noticed steady increases in the single carts. The inks for the Canon ipf8300/ipf8400 are a MUCH better deal, and the Canon carts actually hold a useful quantity of ink (330ml or 700ml). If you can get a deal on the Canon ipf8400, get it. I picked up a 44" ipf8300 for around $2200 back when Canon was about to bring out the ipf8400. It's all around better than the z3100 in all ways but 3: The z has the built in spectro, the z can make true neutral tone B&W prints using no color inks, and the z uses a gloss enhancer. You'll never quite eliminate gloss differential on the Canon for that reason. I print my satin and glossy photo prints on the z3100. Everything else goes to the Canon. The Canon is insanely faster, and the software blows away the clunky HP software. Productivity definitely went up when I got the Canon. You should definitely fix the z, though, because for not much time and / or money you can use the z for printing, or just use the spectro on the z to build custom profiles for the Canon. It works great and they are better than the canned profiles from the paper manufacturers or retailers.
All around, if I was forced to pick one of the other, the larger carts and better deal on the Canon ink, plus the speed and efficiency of the Canon, would make it my choice. Still like having both, though. The z has some real strengths.