Hi Edmund,
I have a payed for license for Capture One, so cost is not the issue for me. I have three real issues and a few other ones:
1) My workflow is Lightroom. Parametric workflow. I could switch to Capture One but that means reprocessing 75000 images.
2) I cannot get the images I want with Capture One. OK, I have worked with Lightroom since 2006, so I have a long experience. Wit C1 one I have something like eight months of reluctant experience.
3) Capture One is just incomprehensible. Hard to relate controls to physics. Lightroom is similar in a sense but they make a better job. Jeff Schewe and Eric Chan are good at explaining Lightroom. I don't feel that Phase One has that good level of communication.
4) Lightroom can work with calibration workflow, based on test targets and math. Capture One makes a mess of it. LR has Adobe DNG Profile editor, Color Checker Passport software and QPcard software. Does C1 has any profiling software available? I understand you may use Argyll, but I got the impression that C1 ICC profiles are a mess.
5) Capture One doesn't really support DNG or any other open format whatever that may be. I am strongly against proprietary data formats.
6) I feel the user interface in C1 is horrible. It can be configured in many ways, I know, but I want something that is not configurable but works. Try supporting someone who has an entirely different setup than yours, possibly in another language and you get the idea. Why is saturation grouped together with exposure?
7) I don't really feel good about Phase One. Expensive products, lot of marketing but I don't feel they deliver. The P45+ I have has been around for six years or so. It delivers lots of detail compared to my Alpha 900, which is a pair years younger, but it also delivers lots of artefacts. The artefacts are a downside. They could have added an OLP filter and lost some edge contrast, but Phase One saved a thousand Dollar or two, and gave us aliasing artifacts. Noisy shadows. I am not upset with my purchase, it was what I have expected and that is what I got.
No mistake, I like my P45+ and Hasselblad 555 ELD. I like both camera and the back. I also like the Zeiss lenses. The area where MF, Phase One, P45+ and Zeiss delivers is sharpness, not always but mostly.
Look at the two images below. Left side is what I achieved in C1 with 1/2 hour work. Right side is LR5.3 without adjustment except setting white balance and choosing the QPCard profile, all sliders at zero.
Sorry for getting agitated, it just that C1 provokes a lot of feelings, none of which positive. That said I see a few advantages in C1, processing is faster and it produces less aliasing artefacts than LR.
Best regards
Erik
Erik,
If you are using a Phase back, I very, very strongly recommend C1.
The use is free with their backs - just switch it into DB mode when it asks for a license.
Edmund