Hi all.
I've been craving medium format photography for a while now but haven't done any of it due to the cost of buying and developing film.
I've owned a couple medium format cameras which I subsequently sold without even using. And every time, I wanted to burn a roll or two, but never did it.
The only option for me was to get one with a digital back, but if I'm worried about a few quids/dollars with film and it's glorious image area, how in the world am I going to get a similar-area digital back? This was out of the question unless some sort of a miracle find happens.
So I kept an eye on digital backs for a while and true, they are all out of my budget.
Except of course for older/legacy digital backs. Some of the only ones within my budget have only had an image area similar to a full frame 35mm DSLR. Maybe an extra millimeter, so what's the point? But hey! That gave me an idea.
If a £500 back has about 35mm format frame, why don't I mount a full frame DSLR on a medium format system?
And so this happened:
This was in fact a different kind of project that I had been working on a while earlier, trying to make a versatile tilt-shift adapter using Medium Format lenses on a DSLR, similar to the Mirex one but home made and much cheaper and more versatile. I had a couple designs (one of my ideas I later found as a new product, somebody else beat me to it), but I have been very limited with resources and had no recourse to material hard enough to carry a MF lens. This is why I tried this with the Fuji GX680. The craving here was not for the image area, but for the tilt-shift action specific to the Fuji GX680 bracket, the sharpness of the lens system, and the lack of vignetting/chromatic aberrations in all of my images thanks to the larger image circle. Nevertheless the result is even more portable than any of those backs tether-only backs. And you can see the shot right away. Think of it like a non-handheld DSLR with a lens adapter. The only drawback was the hassle of putting my camera on and off the "adaptered camera" body.
I could also use any camera with those lenses. My Canon 5D is now a 5DmkII, and I've also tried 350D and EOS M which makes this outfit really light and portable.
Not only that, I can put any medium/large format lens and tilt-shift it by cutting a simple wooden holder and fit it on the bracket.
Zodiak 30mm f3.5 fisheye
Mamiya Sekor C 45mm f2.8
the following two shots are taken with the Mamiya 45mm f2.8, with and without shift, but no bellows were used so there were light leaks.
==================================
I still have a working Fujifilm GX680 II body and three lenses (and many film backs) that I want to digitize by buying an actual digital back, but my question is, with legacy backs such as the Volare and maybe other 2004/5 backs: is there anything to gain over my Canon 5D mk II? Is the dynamic range colour accuracy significantly better? Or would you say what I have is the best I can get for this kind of money, and that any significant improvement should/must set me back a couple thousand pounds for a serious back? (I know I want the bigger image area but GOD I can't afford it).