Doesn't anyone testing these cameras suggest/insist on stuff like this?! I sometimes wonder if pre-pro testing is much more than a mutual ass-kissing exercise between makers and testers.
-Dave-
Dave,
Your right. You'd be surprised at the efforts photographers go to to get a loaner or a camera deal. (maybe not)
It's crazy considering, but yes, most pretty much say what the manufacturer wants to hear and if not, they are ignored. There is always exceptions.
Fuji USA was the best I ever dealt with as they gave stuff, asked for honest opinions and never seemed to get their feelings hurt or ask for edited quotes about products.
Maybe that's changed, I dunno.
I will say that I find the new fuji interesting because the out of camera looks are pretty and the high iso is very good, especially on people. For me I'd like to see more lenses, a few longer ones and better video with stabilization, but in regards to a still camera the files I've seen from the previous generations were very nice. (and I'm not looking for a free camera though would take a truck load of gold bars if offered.)
Actually given all the movement in mirrorless, what I'd like to see is about 20 mpx on stills, 2.5 k to 3k in video, in an aps c size sensor( or 43), small lenses with fast primes like the Olympus M43, though even faster something in the 1.2 to 1.4 range in primes, 2.0 in zooms (I know the zooms would be large), gh3 level video, dual sound channels, Olympus style and build quality, Olympus 5 axis stabilization, Fuji color and iso.
IMO
BC