This is actually a reply to Bullfrog's post more so than the original post. However I feel it will certainly add to the conversation. Bullfrog seemed to insinuate that he is rolling Eco Print Shield onto a paper substrate, a procedure that I don't use. I have however been using Eco Print Shield on Breathing Colour Chromata White for approximately 5 years, and except for one bad bottle(likely frozen during transit) I've had absolutely NO issues at all with the product. I do use only Epson inks, so perhaps that has some relevance, as Bullfrog implied. Since I use only Epson inks I have no other situation to compare, so that might be a moot point. As far as applying NO pressure with the roller, I've also never found that to be an issue. One thing I did learn very quickly was not to start applying the first coat with a completely dry roller. Therefore, before the first application I always wet the roller thoroughly and then squeeze out as much water as possible and use a lint free paper towel to absorb the rest, leaving the roller with a slightly damp feeling. As you might guess, this facilitates the roller picking up a good quantity of the coating and spreading it more evenly during the first coat. Since I use only matte canvas this is a very important step IMO. Of course you will never obtain a perfectly even coating during the first application, but that will definitely be taken care of with the second coat. I apply three coats and have never noticed the "rubber maid" appearance that Bullfrog alludes to. My first and second coats are Satin and the third is usually a 50/50 mix of Satin and Gloss for a very nice finish. Occasionally I have a customer who likes the Satin only or perhaps a Gloss finish, so that's not a problem. It's always the final coat that determines the amount of gloss.
I'm sorry that Bullfrog has had some bad luck with the Eco Print Shield product, but that has certainly not been my experience on the canvas and ink combination I use. I will say that at one point I did try some Hahnemühle canvas and was not happy with the coating, so I abandoned that combination and stayed with the aforementioned approach. I hope this is of some help.
Gary
Hi Gary
I didn't insinuate anything. I reported my personal experience with the product - which was factual. To clear up your other assumptions, no, I did not use paper, I used (and still use) mat canvas with canon inks. My last statement and a reference to "paper' was a generic statement. My point was the choice of CANVAS would /could affect the results and since I was using Canon canvas (paper) and canon inks and the other user I spoke with (who used it successfully) was using Epson canvas paper and Epson inks - that MAY make a difference.
That is supposition on my part because I have no knowledge of one other user in Ontario that has/had a 6100 (lucia inks) and Canon mat canvas and uses it successfully nor could the manufacturer or the store provide me with one - factually, at that time, the product literature I was given indicated it was tested on Epson and while it may have changed, at the time I could find no reference information to state it was tested on Canon inks nor could the manufacturer provide it. I qualify Ontario because I was also told by both the manufacturer and the other Epson user (who lived in Ontario as well) that our dry winters would affect the product viscosity and application - in other words, it favours humid conditions, not dry. I was applying it in mid summer - the most humid (read optimal) time of the year and still with miserable results.
I do recall the manufacturer pointing me towards another canvas and it may be the one you use - and I was prepared to switch but at the time, they had no profiles for the canon printer. It really was a lonely world back then with Canon
(sob)
Anyway, that whole roller technique, the application and a bunch more detail I've long since forgotten was explained to me by the very nice help people of Eco Print Shield who painstakingly tried to help. As I mentioned its been a few years. Suffice to say, it drove me nuts, the so called benefit of "water" soluble was a small and increasingly insignificant virtue (I guess my sink was happy for all the attention it got dumping lots of coating
and I still have a jug in the basement along with plenty of spongy white rollers and trays to remind me of my "journey" . :-0
Don't be sorry I had bad luck - I'm actually grateful it didn't work out because it forced me to move to another product which I still use today - one which in my view is far superior, and one I"m very pleased with and in the 4 or more years of using it, I can factually state no yellowing, no fading.
As far as yellowing, and actual UV protection of the Eco Print shield - I have no idea. There was no research on Canon inks (that I was provided with or aware of), there was nothing beyond the manufacturer's claim AT THE TIME. That isn't to say it won't - I don't know. The Wilhelm institute was reporting all kinds of data from their study on Epson - but it was silent on Canon., Again, since I may be taken to task for this - I clarify - AT THE TIME. It was 3 or 4 years ago (memory) and I don't keep current on products I don't use.
To the OP: As an aside, Glamour /Timeless was the alternative I was provided, but my appetite for the water soluble was tainted and I chose a different route. If I was going to switch to water soluble today, I would favour Timeless/Glamour II - but I would only use it if I used their canvas (Lyve) with it.