Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Rough and smooth  (Read 783 times)

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2163
Rough and smooth
« on: September 05, 2013, 08:25:48 PM »

Mostly I like flowing water smoothed, but in the first case I find the roughness attractive. Suggestions welcome.

Tony Jay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2526
Re: Rough and smooth
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2013, 08:45:43 PM »

Both images work well Scott.

Tony Jay
Logged

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2771
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Rough and smooth
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2013, 04:38:42 AM »

I like both, but prefer the second one. It gives me more context.

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2163
Re: Rough and smooth
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2013, 11:04:01 AM »

I like both, but prefer the second one. It gives me more context.

Thanks, Tony and Paulo. I've heard the context comment before. I wonder where the line is between presenting the main attraction alone and setting it in context.

Fine_Art

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1173
Re: Rough and smooth
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2013, 02:16:00 AM »

Thanks, Tony and Paulo. I've heard the context comment before. I wonder where the line is between presenting the main attraction alone and setting it in context.

I'd venture it is how interesting the main attraction is. A great painting will wow you without a frame or nice setting. Some paintings need props.

I like the images.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up