Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Wildlife winners  (Read 579 times)

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5422
Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Wildlife winners
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2013, 02:08:04 AM »

The resolution sucks, but that's the web for ya.  Still, some rather intriguing work there!  Love the otter.

Thanks for sharing!

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8139
Re: Wildlife winners
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2013, 04:43:49 AM »

Some excellent work, thanks for sharing.

As for the low resolution, I have to agree but I'm sure that the majority of viewers will use a low-res device and spend less than 10 seconds on each photo.
Logged
Francois

BJL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5684
Wildlife winners, higher res., and some on the left side of the Atlantic
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2013, 02:45:03 PM »

I suppose that for those who care about higher resolution, you are mean to buy the "stunning book" or attend one of the exhibitions as advertised, rather than expect to get it for free and without effort!

Also, I just noticed that there is a better slide-show if you go to the actual awards site instead of through the Telegraph: http://bwpawards.org and click on the "eye-con".

And if you cannot get to any of those venues, another option is a similar exhibition at the National Museum of Natural History in Washington:
2012 World's Best nature Photography: Windland Smith Rice International Awards Also with a book of course.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2013, 02:54:09 PM by BJL »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up