Topic: Wildlife winners (Read 926 times)

Jeremy Roussak · « **on:** September 02, 2013, 04:47:39 pm »

Worth a look: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/earth/10280016/The-winners-in-the-British-Wildlife-Photography-Awards-2013.html

Jeremy

wolfnowl · « **Reply #1 on:** September 03, 2013, 02:08:04 am »

The resolution sucks, but that's the web for ya. Still, some rather intriguing work there! Love the otter.

Thanks for sharing!

Mike.

francois · « **Reply #2 on:** September 03, 2013, 04:43:49 am »

Some excellent work, thanks for sharing.

As for the low resolution, I have to agree but I'm sure that the majority of viewers will use a low-res device and spend less than 10 seconds on each photo.

BJL · « **Reply #3 on:** September 03, 2013, 02:45:03 pm »

I suppose that for those who care about higher resolution, you are mean to buy the "stunning book" or attend one of the exhibitions as advertised, rather than expect to get it for free and without effort!

Also, I just noticed that there is a better slide-show if you go to the actual awards site instead of through the Telegraph: http://bwpawards.org and click on the "eye-con".

And if you cannot get to any of those venues, another option is a similar exhibition at the National Museum of Natural History in Washington:
2012 World's Best nature Photography: Windland Smith Rice International Awards Also with a book of course.

Author Topic: Wildlife winners (Read 926 times)

Jeremy Roussak

Wildlife winners

wolfnowl

Re: Wildlife winners

francois

Re: Wildlife winners

BJL

Wildlife winners, higher res., and some on the left side of the Atlantic