Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: columbus  (Read 460 times)

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5033
columbus
« on: September 01, 2013, 02:41:26 PM »

I'm not sure about this one. It was a dull, uninteresting day and I thought it was worth a try. Comments?

Jeremy
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7731
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: columbus
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2013, 04:04:03 PM »

It was a dull, uninteresting day, Jeremy. The dull, uninteresting powerlines don't help either. Actually, it's not a bad composition. Maybe losing the powerlines would help.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8789
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: columbus
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2013, 04:20:08 PM »

Usually, the purpose of throwing the foreground into a silhouette is to stress the beauty of the background (mostly sky). With uninteresting sky, no reason to underexpose. No reason to expose for the foreground either, as it would turn 2/3 of the image white. Come to think of it, no reason to expose at all ;)

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5033
Re: columbus
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2013, 05:51:21 PM »

Pithily put, Slobodan, and not entirely unexpected. They're cable car lines, in fact, Russ.

I think I'll go here.

Jeremy
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7945
Re: columbus
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2013, 05:56:29 AM »

Pithily put, Slobodan, and not entirely unexpected. They're cable car lines, in fact, Russ.

I think I'll go here.

Jeremy

You've found one of the Ali Baba'a caves! Might lift one's mood after the Columbus statue!
Logged
Francois
Pages: [1]   Go Up