Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: circular polarizer with least flare?  (Read 7303 times)

Ellis Vener

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2151
    • http://www.ellisvener.com
circular polarizer with least flare?
« on: July 22, 2013, 03:15:08 pm »

I'll be asking this elsewhere as well but I'd like some input on what brand of circular polarizers you find have the least problems with flare. I do not shoot a lot of landscape work but do shoot a lot of interiors and I'd like to know if anyone has better experience with flare suppression with one make of Polarizer over another, also preferably with the least amount color shift as well.
Logged

PeterAit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4559
    • Peter Aitken Photographs
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2013, 03:21:11 pm »

I can't compare with other brands, but I have had excellent results with the Hoya filters.
Logged

Ellis Vener

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2151
    • http://www.ellisvener.com
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2013, 03:24:54 pm »

Hoya makes at least four different models of Polarizer. Which one have you been using Peter?
Logged

NashvilleMike

  • Guest
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2013, 03:41:07 pm »

I'm a fan of either the Zeiss polarizers or the B+W Kaesman MRC thin myself. The Zeiss is quite good on the color/spectral front, and that T* coating is the real deal. Not cheap though...

-m
Logged

Ellis Vener

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2151
    • http://www.ellisvener.com
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2013, 03:52:10 pm »

Mike: I will check out the Zeiss. I tried the B&W the other day and there was too much color shift. The Nikon Circular Polarizer I tried was far more neutral, but they don't make it in the size I need (82mm).
Logged

Lee Rentz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2013, 05:41:42 pm »

I am using a 95mm multi-coated Heliopan circular polarizer; it has good flare resistance and seems better-constructed than the B + W (I had two of them start binding upon turning, then break apart and fall on the ground, shattering the glass). I have been using this one for about a year, and the color rendition is very good.
Logged

Paul2660

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4066
    • Photos of Arkansas
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2013, 06:14:32 pm »

Ellis:

I use both the Heliopan's, or Hoya Pro 1 series.   The Hoya's are slim but still have front threads.  The Helopan's are made with brass rings and area very well made, but they also are quite heavy. 

Here is a link to the BH site with the Hoya:
http://http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/391185-REG/Hoya_XD77CRPL_77mm_Circular_Polarizing_Pro.html

Also you might consider Tiffen's pro line as they have IR filtering.  This is nice feature for outdoor work on longer exposures. 

Paul Caldwell


Logged
Paul Caldwell
Little Rock, Arkansas U.S.
www.photosofarkansas.com

Jason DiMichele

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 165
    • Jason DiMichele - Fine Art Photographer and Printer
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2013, 08:05:50 pm »

+1 to the Hoya Pro 1 series. And I've never had any problem with any of the B+W filters. I've always purchased my filters from www.2filter.com for some really good prices.

Cheers!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Logged
Jason DiMichele
Fine Art Photographer an

Paul2660

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4066
    • Photos of Arkansas
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2013, 09:01:11 pm »

I love 2filter also.  But they quit selling Hoya about a year or so ago.  They lead with Marumi which cost less but work well also.  I have a 95mm Marumi that works great no flare.  They use aluminum and can bind. 

If you call 2filter make sure you ask for Andrea.


Paul Caldwell
Logged
Paul Caldwell
Little Rock, Arkansas U.S.
www.photosofarkansas.com

rgs

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
    • Richard Smith Photography
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2013, 10:36:02 pm »

I have a Marumi CPL (from 2filter). It seems very well made, optically excellent and I have found no problem with flare. It's a little less expensive than other premium brands.
Logged

BernardLanguillier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13983
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernardlanguillier/sets/
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2013, 12:58:39 am »

I have been using this for nearly one year... works great. the light loss is a lot less than with other PL filters which is a key feature for pano shooting in forest environment as is speeds up each frame by a factor of 2 every other thing being equal.

http://www.kenkoglobal.com/zeta-ex_features.html

Although the Kenko Zeta seems to be identical to the Hoya HD series outside Japan, the Zeta EX seems to have no equivalent. They are both positionned above the Pro1.

Cheers,
Bernard
« Last Edit: July 29, 2013, 05:46:07 am by BernardLanguillier »
Logged

PhotoEcosse

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 712
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #11 on: July 29, 2013, 02:40:49 pm »

7-Day Shop's own brand (made, I think by Hama) work well for me.

But I think the question of flare will differ from lens to lens and some filters may be better on certain lenses and other filters on other lenses.

Colour "shift", if it is noticeable, should be easily corrected in Lightroom.
Logged
************************************
"Reality is an illusion caused by lack of alcohol."
Alternatively, "Life begins at the far end of your comfort zone."

Bearmann

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24
    • http://brsphoto.zenfolio.com/
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #12 on: August 13, 2013, 02:28:19 pm »

Ellis,

I'm surprised that no one has linked to these articles, yet. Here is some testing on multiple brands. It appears that the B+W's fare the best. You can get the actual flare results on the Excel file link located part way down the page of chapter 4.

http://www.lenstip.com/115.1-article-Polarizing_filters_test_Introduction.html

http://www.lenstip.com/119.1-article-Polarizing_filters_test_-_supplement.html

Barry
Logged
Barry[/font]

Lee Rentz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #13 on: August 13, 2013, 02:44:12 pm »

My problem with B + W was not the flare resistance or optical quality, but the mechanical action. I use a 95mm filter on the front of a wide angle lens, and have had two B + W filters in five years break apart and fall onto the rocks, shattering the glass. It wasn't a good thing to have happen when I was on an assignment.
Logged

Bearmann

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24
    • http://brsphoto.zenfolio.com/
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2013, 02:55:44 pm »

My problem with B + W was not the flare resistance or optical quality, but the mechanical action. I use a 95mm filter on the front of a wide angle lens, and have had two B + W filters in five years break apart and fall onto the rocks, shattering the glass. It wasn't a good thing to have happen when I was on an assignment.

This seems to be a not uncommon complaint with the Hoya polarizers, but this is the first I heard of it with the B+W's.
Logged
Barry[/font]

AlfSollund

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 168
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2013, 05:40:52 pm »

Generally a multicoated is better. But you can reduce the flare a lot with lens hood. or something shading sun or bright light from hitting surface of filter. My experience is also that a filter sitting closer to lens element is the better.

Best of luck!
Logged
-------
- If your're not telling a story with photo you're only adding noise -
http://alfsollund.com/

dwswager

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1375
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2014, 11:32:47 am »

I'll be asking this elsewhere as well but I'd like some input on what brand of circular polarizers you find have the least problems with flare. I do not shoot a lot of landscape work but do shoot a lot of interiors and I'd like to know if anyone has better experience with flare suppression with one make of Polarizer over another, also preferably with the least amount color shift as well.

Way late to this Ellis, but I was wondering which way you went?

I will tell you from my 30 years experience there are only 2 CPLs I would buy.  For 98% of people, it would be the Nikon CPL II.  For the rest, shooting in harsh and wet environments, the B+W XS-Pro KSM CPL because it is sealed.  Warning on the XS-Pro, it is slightly larger than the filter threads so bayonet hoods that are really tight might not go over it.  Both are fairly thing and both have front threads.  Image attached.

I find the rendition of the Nikon, strength of effect, clarity and limited color cast, better than anything else.  Like the  5T and 6T diopters (no longer manufactured), there is just something special about the Nikon CPLs.  And even 20 year old ones were easy to keep clean, unlike old single and multi coated B+W filters that are a bitch.  And I find it easier to put on and take off.  I don't know if is brass or aluminum, but I find that B+W filters bind as bad as Tiffen filters.  The Hoya CPls (MC and Pro1 Digital, no experience with the HD line) are really nice, but I've had 1 auto disassemble (62mm) and one come apart when I fumbled it onto a hard wood floor (72mm).  So I stopped buying anything Hoya but ND.

Most of my filters over the years have been either B+W or top end Hoya. I've also had some Heliopan and the odd Tiffen Enhancing filter I picked out of a camera show bin for $4.  But when it comes to CPL, I always seem to go back to the Nikon.   I own 62mm Nikon CPL, 67mm Nikon CPL II, 77mm Nikon CPL II and 77mm B+W Multi Coated CPLs.  I bought the B+W when I got my 1st lens with 77mm threads and and 9 month later bought the Nikon to replace it. 

Most people that reflexively recommend B+W filters do so more off the reputation of Schneider Optics and Schott Glass than real world experience. B+W made their bones about 20 years ago when grinding and polishing glass extremely flat to very fine tolerances was difficult.  With manufacturing technology today, it's just not that hard anymore.
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: circular polarizer with least flare?
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2014, 12:27:23 pm »

...

I will tell you from my 30 years experience there are only 2 CPLs I would buy.  For 98% of people, it would be the Nikon CPL II.  For the rest, shooting in harsh and wet environments, the B+W XS-Pro KSM CPL because it is sealed.  Warning on the XS-Pro, it is slightly larger than the filter threads so bayonet hoods that are really tight might not go over it.  Both are fairly thing and both have front threads.  Image attached.

I used both (in smaller size though) and I don't recall any particular issues with flare.
I have mostly the B+W Kaesseman  in different sizes and I think the Nikon was a little easier to clean.
Pages: [1]   Go Up