Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Untitled  (Read 1015 times)

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 812
Untitled
« on: July 16, 2013, 02:25:48 pm »

Thoughts please?

William Walker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1134
    • William Walker Landscapes
Re: Untitled
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2013, 03:43:06 pm »

Hi Riaan

I must say, while I am not against graininess, I don't think it does the lady's face any favours here.

Other than that, I think is is a good portrait.

William
Logged
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." Christopher Hitchens

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2013, 03:43:33 pm »

I like the lighting, Riaan, but this is a face that really needs a left push on the clarity slider.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

nemo295

  • Guest
Re: Untitled
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2013, 06:28:37 pm »

I like the lighting, Riaan, but this is a face that really needs a left push on the clarity slider.

+1

Far left.
Logged

louoates

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
    • Lou Oates Photography
Re: Untitled
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2013, 06:36:44 pm »

All the elements of a really good b/w portrait...minus the grain.
Logged

AFairley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1486
Re: Untitled
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2013, 07:06:45 pm »

Nice highlight on the hair below the face!  +1 on smoothing things out.
Logged

WalterEG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
Re: Untitled
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2013, 07:15:03 pm »

Riaan,

 I find this a most captivating portrait — the facial expression poses so many questions and all the while there is an air of mischief.  I love it and it harks back to a time of more realistic portraiture as opposed to the sanitised, homogenised predictable glossed up plastic of so much of today's offerings.

I beg to differ with some of the other comments.  I have no issue at all with the gritty grainy starkness of the image.  In the recent past there was such diversity of presentation in portaiture .... particularly editorial portraiture .... which is sadly missing in this era of the soporific perfection of digital capture.  Nigel Parry's work in England before he went west across the Atlantic springs to mind.  And a lot of David Bailey.

The pic has pleased me and rekindled my faith in vision.

W
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2013, 07:54:28 pm »

I agree that it's a fine and arresting portrait, but I also find the grain distracting. I think it could be improved a lot with some judicious softening, but stopping way short of the "plastic" look.

Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Untitled
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2013, 03:51:49 am »

I agree with Eric. Something short of a fuzzy, soft-focus look is great, but there's just too much grain here and it interferes with my enjoyment of a nicely intimate portrait. I'm sure there's a happy medium.

Jeremy
Logged

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 812
Re: Untitled
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2013, 01:55:00 pm »

Thank you for the comments, appreciated.
Pages: [1]   Go Up