Quoting a guy that makes a fool of himself talking to empty chairs, saying such enlightening things as "for Christ sake" (I seriously doubt he cares about these forums), and ending with "you coward"... such a sterling example of "manners" and "internet personna".
Not that I owe you anything or feel compelled to genuflect to your seemingly self-important post count (I haven't found any correlation between numbers of posts and quality of same, your response is a case in point), but here are some answers to your mistaken assumptions:
I've followed LL for many years and have more than nine posts, but a screw up with LL's system made my name no longer accepted so I simply reregistered and took out the vowels in my name…problem solved.
My activity re: Adobe is because of the seismic changes they have made so callously. No more need be said about that except that the dismissive acerbic hyperbole used against Bernard invites the same in response. What's sauce for us mere forum schlubs is sauce for His Supreme Doodeness.
I wasn't giving information, merely commenting on the way-over-the-top and dismissive response to Bernard's benign and brief little jibe at Adobe, kind of like the way you gave no useful info. I will give you this, Bernard did defend himself just fine and I probably should have left it at that. Although Jeff went on to lecture Bernard about choosing his jokes more wisely, how ironic coming from the dismissive/, bordering on abusive, joke king.
My name is John Mahan, which you would have known if you had actuality read the small number of posts that bother you so much. Also, since when is a person's name required? Are all the others on these forums not using their actual names also cowards? Since you invoke Christ's name, perhaps you should look to the log in your own eye before gauging out the speck in someone else's eye. And yes, that lesson is one for me to pay more attention to also.
In Forest Gump's words (much prefer him to Dirty Harry), "…that's about all I have to say about that.