Luminous Landscape Home
Luminous Landscape Forum > The Art of Photography > User Critiques > Over the Hill at 30
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Over the Hill at 30  (Read 797 times)

seamus finn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1243
Over the Hill at 30
« on: June 12, 2013, 08:22:05 pm »

Surely not.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Over the Hill at 30
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2013, 04:07:26 am »
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13792
Re: Over the Hill at 30
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2013, 06:40:29 am »
Puzzling, but I like it.
Logged
Francois

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Over the Hill at 30
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2013, 12:21:43 pm »
Now there's ambiguity!
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Over the Hill at 30
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2013, 01:11:45 pm »
Quote from: RSL on June 13, 2013, 12:21:43 pm
Now there's ambiguity!
of the best kind!
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Ken Bennett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1797
    • http://www.kenbennettphoto.com
Re: Over the Hill at 30
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2013, 01:48:55 pm »
Ambiguity, yes, but disturbing nonetheless.
Logged
Equipment: a camera and some lenses. https://www.instagram.com/wakeforestphoto/
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Luminous Landscape Forum > The Art of Photography > User Critiques > Over the Hill at 30