It would be helpful if you also had a link to to the actual data, it is hard to know what you are referring to.
If Hasselblad wanted to develop an APS-C system in house it would take large resources, basing on an existing design takes a lot of sense. My issue is mainly that I see the Lunarcy as just outer design, and ugly design at.
"As for the actual data on the website, it's very sad that there is no person who watches over this."
This is a reference to the OP. Outdated information on the website, errors...
I agree with you. And I repeat. Let it be nice, tasteful products. Lunar is an example of something very wrong. It should never see the light of day. This shows a lack of taste, lack of competence of the board of directors. CEO of seeing this monster should not prevent the presentation at Photokina. That did not happen. It harms the history of the brand. It should not have happened, it should never happen again!