Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Is this the HDR you all hate?  (Read 7233 times)

leuallen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 315
Is this the HDR you all hate?
« on: May 25, 2013, 12:51:26 PM »

I use HDR all the time but going for the natural effect, not pushing things or opening up the shadows too much. I rarely go for the wild effect but this image screamed at me 'do it! do it!'.

I rather like the effect. It made a very nice print.

The car belongs to a local farmer, somewhat of a character. It is not a daily driver but gets out weekly. We see it around these parts frequently.

Panasonic GH3, 12-35 2.8 at 35. ISO 200. Photomatix, PS, and LR. 

Larry
Logged

kaelaria

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2223
    • http://www.bgpictures.com
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2013, 02:00:29 PM »

No, more like this :)

PeterAit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2534
    • Peter Aitken Photographs
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2013, 02:43:26 PM »

 No, that is skillful and appropriate HDR. In fact, I would not have guessed HDR if you had not mentioned it.
Logged
Peter
"Photographic technique is a means to an end, never the end itself."
View my web page
View my Facebook page

leuallen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 315
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2013, 03:01:13 PM »

kaelaria

No. The car is too new. javascript:void(0);

PeterAit

To which image are you referring? The yellow car, to me, is obviously HDR - slight halos and overall tonality.

Larry
Logged

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1652
Hate is too strong a word
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2013, 03:28:13 PM »

I'm not a fan of the kind of HDR represented by the VW photo in this thread, but your photo is fine. I don't hate extreme HDR anyway. My issue with it is similar to the one I have with many digi-era techniques: their ease of application and their ubiquity turn them into gimmicks.

It's ironic that I've become attracted to a more straight-from-the-camera approach at a time when almost anything is possible post-processing-wise. The goal is to move past gimmicks & over-conceptualizing towards a kind of photography that better respects the observed moment. Less Wall & Sherman and more Winogrand.   ;)

-Dave-
Logged

leuallen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 315
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2013, 04:13:00 PM »

Telecaster

I agree with the ubiquity aspect of digital processing. But since I am in the middle of the cornfields of Central Illinois and the folks around here are generally not photo sophisticated, it's new to them.

As I said previously, I generally go for the more natural look so this was a departure for me.

Larry
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10968
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2013, 04:26:35 PM »

The OP's image is fine. The yellow car is bloody awful
+1.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

RFPhotography

  • Guest
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2013, 06:21:21 PM »

In the first it's very obvious that some form of strong local contrast has been applied.  Whether it's HDR or a plugin like Topaz it's quite obvious.  But it suits the subject.  That's the point. If the processing suits the subject, it works.  This type of strong local contrast wouldn't suit other subject matter.

In the second, any processing; HDR or otherwise, that induces halos is bad processing.
Logged

Tony Jay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2602
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2013, 06:33:03 PM »

In the first it's very obvious that some form of strong local contrast has been applied.  Whether it's HDR or a plugin like Topaz it's quite obvious.  But it suits the subject.  That's the point. If the processing suits the subject, it works.  This type of strong local contrast wouldn't suit other subject matter.

In the second, any processing; HDR or otherwise, that induces halos is bad processing.
Yes, I agree.
This is a common sense approach to post-processing.
(Not much different, in principle to applying in-camera techniques.)

Tony Jay
Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #10 on: May 25, 2013, 09:23:45 PM »

Well done, Larry. Thanks for sharing it!

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 9266
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2013, 01:48:56 AM »

Excellent processing; quite appropriate for the subject.

mac_paolo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 429
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2013, 02:41:48 AM »

HDR is a status, not a technique.
I think the way you approached that is perfectly acceptable and good looking.
Nice shot!
Logged

Alan Smallbone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 586
    • APS Photography
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2013, 11:50:10 AM »

Larry I think your image is great, well done and very good use of HDR, the second post of the VW is pretty bad.
In the end it is what fits your vision, everything else is just noise and opinion, if you are happy it really does not matter what others think.  ;D

Alan
« Last Edit: May 26, 2013, 11:51:47 AM by snoleoprd »
Logged
Alan Smallbone
Orange County, CA

leuallen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 315
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2013, 12:02:30 PM »

For historical purposes here is the same car about 2 years ago after hitting a deer. The grill has since been replaced and some front end work done. You can't see it clearly but there is lettering on the recent image just behind the right turn lamp: Barncar = 1 Deer =0.

Larry
Logged

Roman Racela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 285
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2013, 06:28:53 PM »

It looks fine to me, Larry. You did just enough I think.

But the yellow Beetle looks horrible.


I use HDR all the time but going for the natural effect, not pushing things or opening up the shadows too much. I rarely go for the wild effect but this image screamed at me 'do it! do it!'.

I rather like the effect. It made a very nice print.

The car belongs to a local farmer, somewhat of a character. It is not a daily driver but gets out weekly. We see it around these parts frequently.

Panasonic GH3, 12-35 2.8 at 35. ISO 200. Photomatix, PS, and LR. 

Larry
Logged

slothead

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2013, 10:45:24 PM »

I think there is a time and place for both methods.  I prefer the first image by the OP, but I can see the attraction of the beetle in some situations.  It certainly is an attention grabber (valuable in advertising) and unrealistic but characteristic of an acrylic or oil painting.  I've heard (the uneducated, IMHO) describe a photograph they find attractive because they say "it looks like a painting!"  So to each his own, and the best image for the job.

Thanks all,
Logged
Tom
Nikon D800, D750, N1 J5, Sony A7R, a6000, a5100, Oly E-P2IR
and an assortment of lenses, adapters and tripods

Iluvmycam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 534
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #17 on: May 29, 2013, 01:53:01 PM »

I love HDR is all forms pretty much. If it works, it is fine. If it does not work then I wont use it.
Logged

duane_bolland

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 77
    • flexiblelightphotography.com
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #18 on: May 30, 2013, 01:52:51 PM »

The OP's image is fine. The yellow car is bloody awful
+2
Logged

kayakfari

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
    • Kayakfari.com : (Kayak-far-i) :: Fitness, Adventure & Art on the High Seas!
Re: Is this the HDR you all hate?
« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2013, 02:10:51 PM »

The consensus is clear! IMHO the best HDR is the one you can't really tell was redone ..
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up