Impressive, i had no opportunity to respond any sooner, but Jeff, good action! Most of the functional needs are covered, from my pojnt of view more than i personally need, but if i take into account the functional needs of participants of my lightroom courses, or photogs i happen to know, it (more than) covers it. Including a few additional functionality in LR itself such as those mentioned by Mark Segal. One thing i would add is that its user interface should follow the concept of the lr user interface. This is one of those features of LR is that it is consistent across the modules within LR, and one accustomed is a real strength. Quite a few participants have decided to stop using PS as their primary photo development tool and use LR instead as it is more appropriate for photo's and more time efficient especially when dealing with (large) series of images. But then discovering on certain occasions that they miss a particular function that is present in PS. So in essence a pixelmodule seamlessly integrated into the LR concept, which can be purchased separately.