Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Coastal California  (Read 954 times)

cjogo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1469
Coastal California
« on: May 09, 2013, 01:54:01 PM »

1983 Northern CA  .. Bronica ..50mm
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8132
Re: Coastal California
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2013, 05:21:22 AM »

I like it, the tunnel effect and the successive layers lead to the Rock, in the center of the photo.

Well done!
Logged
Francois

cjogo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1469
Re: Coastal California
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2013, 12:31:03 PM »

I thought it had a different perspective ... with all the layer to sea and cliffs beyond ... thanks
Logged

amolitor

  • Guest
Re: Coastal California
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2013, 12:31:24 PM »

An extraordinary percentage of your photographs are basically this. You love looking through openings, don't you? ;)
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9400
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Coastal California
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2013, 12:41:50 PM »

Splendid composition! Rarely seen for the subject and location.

On a technical note: do I see a slight "blooming" effect at the top of the arch, where it meets the sky? A result of less-than-optimal scanning?

cjogo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1469
Re: Coastal California
« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2013, 06:58:12 PM »

An extraordinary percentage of your photographs are basically this. You love looking through openings, don't you? ;)


Never realized that :_)  its always seems to a portal  8)
Logged

cjogo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1469
Re: Coastal California
« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2013, 06:58:59 PM »

Splendid composition! Rarely seen for the subject and location.

On a technical note: do I see a slight "blooming" effect at the top of the arch, where it meets the sky? A result of less-than-optimal scanning?

I would say poor scanning ...  especially how long ago I scanned this one ...
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up