Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 39   Go Down

Author Topic: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions  (Read 112648 times)

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #640 on: May 12, 2013, 11:43:17 AM »

What if the subscription software reverted to CS6 functionality when the subscription expires? That would take care of the proprietary Adobe file obsolescence problem as computer hardware and operating systems change.

What happens when computer operating systems evolve such that CS6 becomes unusable legacy software? I already have software I use, which the developers will not update, that is compatible with Mac OSX 10.6.8 but not 10.7+. The provision for long-term access to our files needs to be more forward-looking than CS6.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

DeanChriss

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 469
    • http://www.dmcphoto.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #641 on: May 12, 2013, 12:06:57 PM »

What happens when computer operating systems evolve such that CS6 becomes unusable legacy software? I already have software I use, which the developers will not update, that is compatible with Mac OSX 10.6.8 but not 10.7+. The provision for long-term access to our files needs to be more forward-looking than CS6.

What I'm talking about here is the subscription software, that works on whatever the current hardware and operating systems are, and "dumbs down" to CS6 functionality, not CS6 itself. There are a several ways this could be done, including reverting to a separate "CS6" program that has OS/hardware updates only. Your subscription would get all of the latest functionality while the subscription was paid, and would revert to CS6 functionality, but with updates that would allow it to work on current systems when you stop paying. Essentially, what you paid during the subscription period would be the price of the "upgrade" for hardware and OS compatibility.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2013, 12:11:28 PM by DeanChriss »
Logged
- Dean

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1929
    • A Goldhammer Photography
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #642 on: May 12, 2013, 12:09:49 PM »

What happens when computer operating systems evolve such that CS6 becomes unusable legacy software? I already have software I use, which the developers will not update, that is compatible with Mac OSX 10.6.8 but not 10.7+. The provision for long-term access to our files needs to be more forward-looking than CS6.
Of course that's an Apple OS problem and not one for us Windows users! ;D
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #643 on: May 12, 2013, 12:11:38 PM »

I think the easier way of doing this is simply to provide users (either free or for a fee) a perpetual license to the most current Photoshop configuration they have on their computers at the end of a subscription contract should they elect to not renew it. I don't see Adobe going to a lot of trouble over more elaborate schemes. Clearly not the mindset - at least for now. Arguing them back to something reasonable needs to be the easiest, least-cost approach conceivable if it is to work.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #644 on: May 12, 2013, 12:13:51 PM »

Of course that's an Apple OS problem and not one for us Windows users! ;D

Cummon Alan - I used to use Windows also ya know. I have applications that are XP-compliant , not 7 or 8 compliant and the vendor won't upgrade them. I need to maintain an old Toshiba laptop to access them. Ugh. :-)
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

Gulag

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #645 on: May 12, 2013, 12:42:45 PM »

Cummon Alan - I used to use Windows also ya know. I have applications that are XP-compliant , not 7 or 8 compliant and the vendor won't upgrade them. I need to maintain an old Toshiba laptop to access them. Ugh. :-)

Microsoft provides Windows XP Virtual Machine free of charge for W7/8. I have been using a laser printer purchased in 1999, which only has Windows XP driver, without problems on my W7 box.
Logged
"Photography is our exorcism. Primitive society had its masks, bourgeois society its mirrors. We have our images."

— Jean Baudrillard

plugsnpixels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
    • http://www.plugsandpixels.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #646 on: May 12, 2013, 12:47:25 PM »

Alan and Mark, that's a great idea! Let's add a Mac/Windows discussion to this thread! Can't get any hotter ;-)

I have my own thoughts about the unfortunate loss of legacy apps in OSX and the bloat needed to keep them going in Windows but I'll hold my tongue for now...

Gulag, what's the link for the MS VM?
Logged
FREE DIGITAL IMAGING EZINE
http://www.plugsandpixels.com

Gulag

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #647 on: May 12, 2013, 12:53:03 PM »

Gulag, what's the link for the MS VM?

Downloaded and installed it a few years back when I upgraded to W7. Here is a link that can work:

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/install-and-use-windows-xp-mode-in-windows-7
Logged
"Photography is our exorcism. Primitive society had its masks, bourgeois society its mirrors. We have our images."

— Jean Baudrillard

plugsnpixels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
    • http://www.plugsandpixels.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #648 on: May 12, 2013, 01:12:28 PM »

Thanks! I run 7 on my Mac as a VM and have one XP app I need to use occasionally (network management).
Logged
FREE DIGITAL IMAGING EZINE
http://www.plugsandpixels.com

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #649 on: May 12, 2013, 01:23:31 PM »

Downloaded and installed it a few years back when I upgraded to W7. Here is a link that can work:

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/install-and-use-windows-xp-mode-in-windows-7

Very interesting: now here is one for you (and sorry if a bit OT - but a good opportunity). I have Windows 7 Professional already running as a VM under Parallels 8 in Mac OSX 10.6.8. So, any idea whether I could run Windows XP mode as a VM within the Windows 7 VM under Parallels on a Mac? :-) Whew.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #650 on: May 12, 2013, 01:26:13 PM »

Alan and Mark, that's a great idea! Let's add a Mac/Windows discussion to this thread! Can't get any hotter ;-)


Yes, I agree, throwing in a Mac-Windows pissing-match on top of a CC-perpetual license flap is exactly what we need to spice-up life on a rainy Sunday, but we're just about off to enjoy Mother's Day, so I'll pass on the opportunity to pursue the "Mother of All LULA Debates".
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

Gulag

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #651 on: May 12, 2013, 01:30:33 PM »

Very interesting: now here is one for you (and sorry if a bit OT - but a good opportunity). I have Windows 7 Professional already running as a VM under Parallels 8 in Mac OSX 10.6.8. So, any idea whether I could run Windows XP mode as a VM within the Windows 7 VM under Parallels on a Mac? :-) Whew.

In theory, that should work without any problems. But, the real catch is performance in that kind scenario, I would think. I haven't used MAC since left college in 80s and can't really answer your question specifically. 
Logged
"Photography is our exorcism. Primitive society had its masks, bourgeois society its mirrors. We have our images."

— Jean Baudrillard

plugsnpixels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
    • http://www.plugsandpixels.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #652 on: May 12, 2013, 01:31:54 PM »

any idea whether I could run Windows XP mode as a VM within the Windows 7 VM under Parallels on a Mac?

I don't see why not. Make sure there's enough RAM to go around.
Logged
FREE DIGITAL IMAGING EZINE
http://www.plugsandpixels.com

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #653 on: May 12, 2013, 01:38:33 PM »

Thanks guys. I have the Windows capability on a Macbook Pro (used largely for my consulting work) that has 8GB of RAM, Intel Cor i7 (2 Core) 2.66 GHz processor and two SSDs, so it should be quite efficient.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

plugsnpixels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
    • http://www.plugsandpixels.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #654 on: May 12, 2013, 01:41:46 PM »

And your Windows VM shouldn't need more than 512 or so megs of RAM anyway, despite what common sense tells you.
Logged
FREE DIGITAL IMAGING EZINE
http://www.plugsandpixels.com

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #655 on: May 12, 2013, 01:50:43 PM »

So unless there is some kind of incompatibility (I suppose one only knows for sure by trying), the hardware should be up to the task.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

Tim Lookingbill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1712
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #656 on: May 12, 2013, 03:34:20 PM »

Quote
What happens when computer operating systems evolve such that CS6 becomes unusable legacy software? I already have software I use, which the developers will not update, that is compatible with Mac OSX 10.6.8 but not 10.7+. The provision for long-term access to our files needs to be more forward-looking than CS6.

That point's been bugging me ever since I started shooting Raw, the reason of which is to preserve non-destructive parametric edits on thousands of images the user owns on top of owning the parametric edits which represents the user's time and creative efforts.

The only solution is to come up with a computer specifically built for photographers with its own OS that doesn't need updating and whose hardware can be replaced with the same compatible components that will preserve and allow further processing on those saved parametric edits years on end.

I think it's safe to assume now that there isn't going to be much useful innovation in technology for photographers regarding Raw processing that requires constantly upgrading and updating to get the latest, greatest wizbang features unless they come up with a "Make my Raw image look glorious" button which I'm not holding my breath on that ever happening.

The current OS's are engineered to accommodate all types of users with all sorts of needs and workflows which most likely is the cause for constant updating and upgrading of hardware and software.
Logged

CoyoteButtes

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #657 on: May 13, 2013, 04:43:25 AM »

Faustoshop?

Think about it. Do you want to subscribe to a service that, if you choose to stop the subscription at any time later in life, you will lose the capability to further edit those images with Photoshop? That is what I understand the terms of Adobe's new Creative Cloud to be.

After an introductory 12 month period, do you really want to be on the hook for $20.00 per month - the rate if you now own CS3 or later - for the rest of your life (plus increases at Adobe's discretion) to be able to edit your photo files?

I can see where this might be beneficial to graphics businesses that have multiple employees and using more CS applications than Photoshop. But individual photographers? Even we so-called "hobbyists"?

And what about third parties like authors, trainers, or organizations like National Association of Photoshop Professionals? I just cancelled my NAPP membership. If I stay with CS6 I don't need NAPP.

I'm thinking that Mephistopheles must be lurking the halls in Adobe's headquarters building.

Are you feeling tempted?
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #658 on: May 13, 2013, 09:28:22 AM »



 I just cancelled my NAPP membership. If I stay with CS6 I don't need NAPP.

Are you feeling tempted?

I wouldn't cancel my NAPP membership because of this. I think the magazine alone is worth the ticket. Much creative and innovative stuff in it every month by some of the best in the industry. CS6 is a tool - what you do with it has infinite possibilities and a NAPP membership helps to keep the mind exercised. I say this with no other interest than being an ordinary NAPP member myself.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11357
    • http://digitaldog.net/
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #659 on: May 13, 2013, 09:35:50 AM »

Do you want to subscribe to a service that, if you choose to stop the subscription at any time later in life, you will lose the capability to further edit those images with Photoshop?

That's absolutely incorrect! As long as you have a copy of Photoshop, ANY copy, you can open those images, you can edit those images. You may not like the lack of some editing functionality IN Photoshop you yourself caused by moving back a version (or more), but if you save the data with this in mind, you could open that image in Photoshop 1!

I've gone back and forth from CC to CS6 but you have to be smart about doing something that traditionally (moving backwards) has seemed unnecessary and to some, rather silly.

You can of course open and edit these images in hundreds of products, again you need to be smart about doing this (save as TIFF). Apple Preview easily opens even a CC PSD (without layers of course). But open and edit? Sure.
Logged
Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 39   Go Up