Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 39   Go Down

Author Topic: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions  (Read 112601 times)

nemophoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 611
    • Nemo Niemann Photography
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #680 on: May 15, 2013, 08:20:26 PM »

I feel I am vindicated in my assessment that Adobe will keep Lightroom separate from CC because the competition is fierce. They just confirmed that in will remain standalone. Pity there aren't many credible options for Photoshop -- which really does set the standard. I've played now with GIMP, Photoline and Paintshop Pro. All decent programs on their own, but the re-learning curve is steep, and they really aren't as good. Pisses me off really, because then Adobe can pull their CC business. For almost everything else, there are vey good alternate programs. I'll update my InDesign and Illustrator to the "last" independent versions -- CS6. Then, I really don't know.

DeanChriss

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 469
    • http://www.dmcphoto.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #681 on: May 15, 2013, 11:38:31 PM »

I feel I am vindicated in my assessment that Adobe will keep Lightroom separate from CC because the competition is fierce. They just confirmed that in will remain standalone. Pity there aren't many credible options for Photoshop -- which really does set the standard. I've played now with GIMP, Photoline and Paintshop Pro. All decent programs on their own, but the re-learning curve is steep, and they really aren't as good. Pisses me off really, because then Adobe can pull their CC business. For almost everything else, there are vey good alternate programs. I'll update my InDesign and Illustrator to the "last" independent versions -- CS6. Then, I really don't know.

Your assessment may well be right, and if it is your reason for it (fierce competition) is all that counts. After having been an Adobe "fan boy" for decades I no longer have any faith in what Adobe confirms or denies. Adobe said they'd continue offering a perpetual license along with a new subscription license. Adobe also set a deadline after which you could upgrade that perpetual license only from the previous version, instead of from three versions back as had previously been their policy. Then, after all the stragglers believed that and upgraded to the latest version (CS6) so they wouldn't be left out of the new, and for some more expensive, perpetual license upgrade path, Adobe said there wouldn't really be any upgrade path after all. Your options were really to subscribe now or subscribe when you can no longer find a computer system that will run CS6. Oh, and by the way, the cost of that subscription will be way more than it was to upgrade the perpetual license every time a new version came out. I think this shows that Adobe's recent confirmations of new policy often have a very short lifetime.

But the real problem here isn't cost, it's the fact that Adobe holds the future of everyone's PSD files (and I think layered TIFFs) in their hands. Yes, I've got flat TIFFs of finished work, but we all know most work is never really finished. We learn new things and go back to layered and masked PSD files to make changes, hopefully improving our images. There are thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of hours invested in those files, and a company whose policy shifts with the direction of the wind actually has complete control of them, including how much you must pay each month to keep using those files. That's an extremely uncomfortable situation. Yes, I know Adobe has always been in control of those files, but prior to recent times Adobe was less mercenary and more reasonable in their decisions so it didn't seem to matter. This has been a real wake-up call.

Adobe software is great, but as the saying goes, "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." After a good fraction of a lifetime spent using Photoshop, and then ACR, I have no idea what's next. If I did I'd be doing it instead of wasting my time ranting like this. If there is a way to sever all ties with Adobe and still do what I do, that would be my strong preference. If that's impossible or impractical, "bending over" knowing I can't trust anything about what Adobe may decide regarding the future of my files is a distasteful option. On a happier note, everyone will survive no matter what Adobe does, even if only their flattened TIFFs make it through this storm.
Logged
- Dean

Chris_Brown

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 893
  • Smile dammit!
    • Chris Brown Photography
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #682 on: May 16, 2013, 12:00:21 AM »

Now the CC is not available. At all. This is unacceptable for us subscribers working under a deadline.  >:(

Logged
~ CB

Rick Popham

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 169
    • http://
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #683 on: May 16, 2013, 07:10:05 AM »

Welcome to the "Cloud"!
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #684 on: May 16, 2013, 08:12:23 AM »

Now the CC is not available. At all. This is unacceptable for us subscribers working under a deadline.  >:(



Chris, don't you think this is a risk to be expected? The stuff is stored on an external server; many things can happen to interfere with data transmission between that server and your computer. No system is perfect. The issue going forward will be the failure rate and what Adobe does to mitigate it. I think, if at all possible, any work that is the least bit critical should be stored in both your own computer and on their server.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11350
    • http://digitaldog.net/
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #685 on: May 16, 2013, 09:18:14 AM »

But the real problem here isn't cost, it's the fact that Adobe holds the future of everyone's PSD files (and I think layered TIFFs) in their hands.

And that was true the day you saved a layered document or any document using proprietary Adobe processing. Kind of true for every software product out there.

If the problem isn't the cost, continue to pay to use proprietary Adobe processing.
Logged
Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/

DeanChriss

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 469
    • http://www.dmcphoto.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #686 on: May 16, 2013, 10:10:24 AM »

And that was true the day you saved a layered document or any document using proprietary Adobe processing. Kind of true for every software product out there.

If the problem isn't the cost, continue to pay to use proprietary Adobe processing.

Yes, I know Adobe has always been in control of those files, but prior to recent times Adobe was less mercenary and more reasonable in their decisions so it didn't seem to matter. This has been a real wake-up call.

At $20/month cost isn't the problem yet. I think the lack of reliability in Adobe's recent statements about what its policies will be indicate a willingness to make rash and unpredictable changes to the detriment of customers like me in the future. Since subscribing is essentially a lifetime commitment if you want to retain use of your files, I see the lack of reliability, and the seemingly new small customer be damned attitude, as being the root problem. A year ago a customer relationship with Adobe felt comfortable and stable. Huge overnight changes in policies and price of a license had never happened and were thus unexpected. The future no longer seems so comfortable and stable, and with so many people locked in, huge overnight policy and price changes are virtually a given. IMO, of course.

« Last Edit: May 16, 2013, 10:17:50 AM by DeanChriss »
Logged
- Dean

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7958
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #687 on: May 16, 2013, 10:21:49 AM »

At $20/month cost isn't the problem yet. I think the lack of reliability in Adobe's recent statements about what its policies will be indicate a willingness to make rash and unpredictable changes to the detriment of customers like me in the future. Since subscribing is essentially a lifetime commitment if you want to retain use of your files, I see the lack of reliability and small customer be damned attitude as being the root problem. A year ago a customer relationship with Adobe felt comfortable and stable. Huge overnight changes in policies and price of a license had never happened and were thus unexpected. The future no longer seems so comfortable and stable, and with so many people locked in, huge overnight policy and price changes are virtually a given. IMO, of course.



Mine too. I think you've hit the nail on the head. The stability and predictability of contractual relationships and understandings with clients are hugely important aspects of business ethics regardless of the legal fine print in the license agreements, and much of our commerce depends on it. Not to say that things mustn't and can't change - they must and they do, but it's the manner in which it's done and the transitional arrangements for mitigating negative impacts on customers that make all the difference in the world. This recent episode has, to my mind, revealed serious managerial lacunae in the corporation. No matter what all the technical advantages of the new arrangements may be, these other aspects are equally important - perhaps they will learn something from this; remains to be seen.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml

davidh202

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 656
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #688 on: May 16, 2013, 10:44:35 AM »

 Thom Hogan  has had some very pertinent thoughts on Adobes decision, starting from his May 6th post... http://bythom.com/

 This may well turn out to be one of the worst business decisions any company has made since Ford introduced the Edsel ;~

 
Logged

ButchM

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 519
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #689 on: May 16, 2013, 11:46:44 AM »

Mine too. I think you've hit the nail on the head. The stability and predictability of contractual relationships and understandings with clients are hugely important aspects of business ethics regardless of the legal fine print in the license agreements, and much of our commerce depends on it. Not to say that things mustn't and can't change - they must and they do, but it's the manner in which it's done and the transitional arrangements for mitigating negative impacts on customers that make all the difference in the world. This recent episode has, to my mind, revealed serious managerial lacunae in the corporation. No matter what all the technical advantages of the new arrangements may be, these other aspects are equally important - perhaps they will learn something from this; remains to be seen.

Indeed, that is the core issue. Trust and confidence in a vendor that is a supporting pillar in your livelihood. While offering a sort of "fixed" pricing structure can ease the the calculations of expenditures ... such drastic policy changes does little to create confidence that there won't be another drastic change at any point Adobe chooses if that change will be in their best interests ... Which is exactly why I have zero confidence that Lightroom won't become a subscription only option in the not too distant future as well. Because on May 5, there was the belief there would be a perpetual license option beyond CS6 ... Though, change is inevitable, I think very few folks expected what was announced on May 6.
Logged

Doyle Yoder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 502
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #690 on: May 16, 2013, 11:59:30 AM »

So much for getting the latest versions with CC. Read the last posts.

http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1059137?start=120&tstart=0
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4154
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #691 on: May 16, 2013, 01:49:49 PM »

Though, change is inevitable, I think very few folks expected what was announced on May 6.

That seems like an argument for ignoring uninformed speculation :-)
Logged

Colorwave

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1007
    • Colorwave Imaging
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #692 on: May 16, 2013, 01:55:42 PM »

That seems like an argument for ignoring uninformed speculation :-)

You mean from people like John Nack and Bryan Hughes?
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4154
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #693 on: May 16, 2013, 02:14:58 PM »

Show me the uninformed speculation you attribute to them and I'll see what I think.
Logged

ButchM

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 519
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #695 on: May 16, 2013, 02:21:47 PM »

That seems like an argument for ignoring uninformed speculation :-)

With the precedent that was set by Adobe last week ... it is neither speculation nor are we uninformed. The die has been cast. Regardless of any assurances that have been offered, Adobe has established they will do as they choose even if they indicated otherwise in the past.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2013, 02:34:22 PM by ButchM »
Logged

Colorwave

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1007
    • Colorwave Imaging
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #696 on: May 16, 2013, 02:34:39 PM »

Show me the uninformed speculation you attribute to them and I'll see what I think.

fa·ce·tious  [fuh-see-shuhs] 
adjective

1.  not meant to be taken seriously or literally: a facetious remark.

I was referencing the fact that Adobe's public faces tried to calm nerves when subscription software was first announced by assuring customers that Adobe was intent on providing a dual licensing strategy, and that what eventually became the CC model was only an option offered in the interest of serving certain customer's interests.  Pretty much what we are hearing now from Tom Hogarty regarding Lightroom.  Of course it is all couched and disclaimed behind the firewall of "not speaking in an official capacity."  I think all three guys are great people, BTW, but they do what they need to do to remain employed by a corporation that I no longer feel is great from the standpoint of customer respect and integrity.

caveat emptor  (ˈɛmptɔː)
 
the principle that the buyer must bear the risk for the quality of goods purchased unless they are covered by the seller's warranty
 
[Latin: let the buyer beware]



Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4154
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #697 on: May 16, 2013, 03:03:18 PM »

Adobe's public faces tried to calm nerves when subscription software was first announced by assuring customers that Adobe was intent on providing a dual licensing strategy, and that what eventually became the CC model was only an option offered in the interest of serving certain customer's interests.

Please show me where "Adobe's public faces..." etc because I now know your comments are "not meant to be taken seriously".

Oct. 3, 2011 Adobe Unveils Creative Cloud
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4154
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #698 on: May 16, 2013, 03:09:23 PM »

With the precedent that was set by Adobe last week ... it is neither speculation nor are we uninformed. The die has been cast. Regardless of any assurances that have been offered, Adobe has established they will do as they choose even if they indicated otherwise in the past.

You seem to feel that Adobe Systems Incorporated made you some kind of promise -- please show me where they made that promise.
Logged

john beardsworth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 3494
    • http://www.beardsworth.co.uk
Re: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions
« Reply #699 on: May 16, 2013, 03:13:30 PM »

You seem to feel that Adobe Systems Incorporated made you some kind of promise -- please show me where they made that promise.
There is an expectation that results from the relationship people have enjoyed with Adobe for many years. You're merely splitting hairs, as well as being irritating.
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 39   Go Up