Pages: 1 ... 128 129 [130] 131 132 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 573250 times)

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2580 on: March 26, 2017, 11:38:03 am »

Yesterday's central market.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2581 on: March 26, 2017, 04:56:44 pm »

No, it is the exact opposite: they always manage to find me ;)


Burlesque for Slobodan:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDPR5EoYqOs

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2582 on: March 27, 2017, 05:05:01 am »

I can't match Slobodan's saturation, but here's a bit of brightly coloured geometric urbanism:
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2583 on: March 27, 2017, 03:22:06 pm »

And another window shot...
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2584 on: March 27, 2017, 03:48:13 pm »

I like the simple colour combination... combine that with LPs and you might be pretty close to heaven.

;-)

Rob

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2585 on: March 28, 2017, 05:41:57 am »

Cynthia in the Reading series...

I wasn't able to dissuade her from wearing make-up... it's a shame, it screws up the skin tones with the natural light and looks almost solarized. But there you go, maybe I'll get another chance.
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2586 on: March 28, 2017, 10:27:05 am »

In 3716 I can see what you mean about the makeup.

However, 3704 is so strong any problems from the makeup are swamped.  And or, because 04 is more formal, the makeup fits in better. 

She doesn't look like someone who would be all wrong.

Bruce
« Last Edit: March 28, 2017, 10:37:11 am by Bruce Cox »
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2587 on: March 28, 2017, 12:26:46 pm »

I'm used to photographing Cynthia at 51,000 iso, where subtlety doesn't count. And yes, she definitely knows her way around a piano...
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2588 on: March 28, 2017, 12:28:56 pm »

Cynthia in the Reading series...

I wasn't able to dissuade her from wearing make-up... it's a shame, it screws up the skin tones with the natural light and looks almost solarized. But there you go, maybe I'll get another chance.

Oh come on Graham, she doesn't look that bad.  ::)
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2589 on: March 29, 2017, 05:59:01 am »

Oh come on Graham, she doesn't look that bad.  ::)

 ;D

Here's the result of some brief (hopefully non-invasive) stalking:
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2590 on: March 29, 2017, 08:00:48 am »

;D

Here's the result of some brief (hopefully non-invasive) stalking:

Just you wait until she processes the latent image resident within the clip!

I base the expectation of a latent image upon the well-founded theory that to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2591 on: March 29, 2017, 08:26:18 am »

Just you wait until she processes the latent image resident within the clip!

Or the glasses...
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2592 on: March 29, 2017, 09:52:57 am »

Or the glasses...


Now your fate is truly sealed: Hi-Def confirmation.

Clever shot!

Rob

JNB_Rare

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1052
    • JNB54
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2593 on: March 29, 2017, 09:53:27 am »

Here's the result of some brief (hopefully non-invasive) stalking:

I used to live in one of the most ethnically diverse cities in North America (Toronto) and took public transit everywhere. During "rush hour" one got a very close look at fellow travelers – you couldn't help it! I often marveled at the fabulous variety of skin tones, and facial structures,  and hair styles, and accoutrements such as jewelry. Such beauty, and such care taken to show it off (mostly with the women, but occasionally with men). I thought one could do a whole book just on ears and earrings alone. But it would have to be studio stuff to really capture all the wonderful tones, and I had neither the setup (at the time) nor the personality to approach the subjects.
Logged

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2594 on: March 29, 2017, 10:04:13 am »

Or the glasses...

Is this still Cynthia? Would be cool if it showed pianokeys in the glasses. It sort of tells us how she is seeing the world. For a musician it would be music of course.

Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2595 on: March 29, 2017, 10:42:15 am »

Is this still Cynthia?

No, just some random woman waiting to cross the road. Hence the stalking comment: I spotted her about 50 metres earlier as she crossed the river ahead of me and I scooted up behind her.

(PS for Rob: no tea was drunk).
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2596 on: March 29, 2017, 11:17:55 am »

No, just some random woman waiting to cross the road. Hence the stalking comment: I spotted her about 50 metres earlier as she crossed the river ahead of me and I scooted up behind her.

(PS for Rob: no tea was drunk).


I'm glad you mentioned that: what with all the scooting going down behind I was getting concerned.

Oh Jeanloup, what have you done? Can an entire sentence be a neologism or just a catchphrase?

;-)

Rob

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2597 on: March 30, 2017, 09:27:20 am »

The Fortress
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2598 on: March 30, 2017, 09:32:17 am »

An experiment in hi-key
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2599 on: March 30, 2017, 10:05:16 am »

In silhouette 1
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures
Pages: 1 ... 128 129 [130] 131 132 ... 137   Go Up