Pages: 1 ... 72 73 [74] 75 76 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 572875 times)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1460 on: March 21, 2016, 11:26:23 am »

Nice touch with these things, Graham. I quite enjoy forms of street where people are not necessarily included. The peripherals to street life are quite interesting in their own right. Must be Leiter tugging my strings!

Rob C

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1461 on: March 21, 2016, 11:53:40 am »

Yep, Saul's work has been inspiring me lately, if that's not too grand a word  ;)
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1462 on: March 21, 2016, 04:30:15 pm »

Yep, Saul's work has been inspiring me lately, if that's not too grand a word  ;)


That's my situation too, ever since I rediscovered him a year or so ago!

And here's a distinction I make: I don't believe I have been influenced by other photographers, but I sure know that I have been inspired by many!

Same difference? I think not. I began to dabble in fashion in '66, as soon as I went out on my own. I already knew all about David Bailey and thought him the bee's knees; however, copying wasn't going to happen: different type of clothes to work with, different models, different budgets (vastly!) and location possibilities. Same when Sarah Moon popped up a few years later: loved her, and still do, to bits! But again, working in different worlds and ambiences. She claims hardly ever to leave Paris for work locations; I never worked there, sadly enough. Saul Leiter is the same: the stuff I love is all yellow cabs, red umbrellas and condensation-drenched windows. A world away from Mallorca. But, in the case of these photographers I admire, they have vision and appear to be able to make something out of pretty much anything that's available. That, is photographic creativity, where you can't just imagine a shot, but have to have a 'something' right in front of the camera and work with it to get where you have to go. I also love the work of Hans Feurer; apparently so simple: just put on a very long lens and shoot against the light. Yeah, right! Try it first with anybody out of your provincial model agency, no hair/make-up experts to design the model, stylists to dress her up in a fantasy look, and see where it gets you!

I think the greatest contribution these 'stars' make is this: they let you know that it is possible to do more than you ever imagined was feasible. They let you believe in infinity.

Rob
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016, 04:38:47 pm by Rob C »
Logged

Patricia Sheley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1112
Re: Without Prejudice 2 / Une Bise
« Reply #1463 on: March 21, 2016, 04:54:42 pm »

~une bise...(edit/modify image size)
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016, 09:38:16 pm by Patricia Sheley »
Logged
A common woman~

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1464 on: March 21, 2016, 08:18:13 pm »

I especially like the two small foreground clouds chasing each other.
I don't think Stieglitz got one quite like this.  ;)

-Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Patricia Sheley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1112
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1465 on: March 21, 2016, 09:43:39 pm »

@Eric,
...he'd forgotten his Cphone that day for note-taking.   :)
Logged
A common woman~

drmike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 988
    • On Flickr:
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1466 on: March 22, 2016, 03:36:52 am »


I think the greatest contribution these 'stars' make is this: they let you know that it is possible to do more than you ever imagined was feasible. They let you believe in infinity.

Rob

I totally agree, their work encourages you to keep trying to develop your own work/style rather than give you examples of what to emulate.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1467 on: March 22, 2016, 05:48:12 am »

About all the exercise I need am willing (capable of?) to undertake!



Now technically, could this be a tricycle? Not as I understood the term when I think I remember having one.

Rob
« Last Edit: March 22, 2016, 05:52:09 am by Rob C »
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1468 on: March 22, 2016, 12:28:50 pm »

About all the exercise I need am willing (capable of?) to undertake!



Now technically, could this be a tricycle? Not as I understood the term when I think I remember having one.

Rob
Not a tricycle, Rob. That would need three wheels. The essence of your image is, I think, captured in the old song (slightly edited to improve the rhymes):

"Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer free.
I'm half crazy, all for the love of thee.
It won't be a stylish marriage,
I can't afford a carriage.
But you look neat
Upon the seat
of a bicycle built for three!"

-Eric

P.S. I like it.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1469 on: March 22, 2016, 03:31:12 pm »

Not a tricycle, Rob. That would need three wheels. The essence of your image is, I think, captured in the old song (slightly edited to improve the rhymes):

"Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer free.
I'm half crazy, all for the love of thee.
It won't be a stylish marriage,
I can't afford a carriage.
But you look neat
Upon the seat
of a bicycle built for three!"

-Eric

P.S. I like it.


Indeed, I like it too: a great adaptation if not a final solution to the question.

Final solutions are also being sought for the stuff just gone down in Brussels. I think Trump was right all along; you know, crazy like a fox?

Rob

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1470 on: March 22, 2016, 04:57:18 pm »

bottoms up

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1471 on: March 27, 2016, 05:35:25 pm »

Colors of music:

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1472 on: March 28, 2016, 04:56:22 pm »

Wet & windy here today

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1473 on: March 29, 2016, 10:04:40 am »

Managed it at last: everyone's goal!



;-)

Rob

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1474 on: March 29, 2016, 12:41:03 pm »

Ansel couldn't have done it better.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1475 on: March 29, 2016, 02:32:10 pm »

Ansel couldn't have done it better.

I know, I know; just too modest to admit it in public.

;-)

Rob C

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1476 on: March 29, 2016, 10:10:48 pm »

fire

razrblck

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 482
  • Chill
    • Instagram
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1477 on: March 30, 2016, 10:07:04 am »

This thread is great, I might contribute as well.

A series of greens.
Logged
Instagram (updated often)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1478 on: April 03, 2016, 02:56:58 pm »

Two from a recent walk through Chicago. The second one is more a political statement: McDonald's and Trump, rags to riches, 99+1 = one nation under...Trump? 😀

P.S. For those not familiar with Chicago, the building in the middle is the Trump Tower.

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1479 on: April 03, 2016, 03:49:52 pm »

Did some shots today with a young actor friend, for her book. This one I rather liked
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 72 73 [74] 75 76 ... 137   Go Up