Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 572107 times)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1280 on: January 06, 2016, 05:03:57 pm »

Welcome:

BobDavid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3307
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1281 on: January 06, 2016, 05:09:45 pm »

Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1282 on: January 06, 2016, 05:42:14 pm »

Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Michael West

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1438
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1283 on: January 06, 2016, 08:03:56 pm »

Logged

Michael West

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1438
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1284 on: January 07, 2016, 01:49:11 pm »

A sign of our times.

 


Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1285 on: January 07, 2016, 05:49:30 pm »

In years past, hollows were made in fields, then planted with trees, to provide a suitable habitat for a fox to site its den. And all for the entertainment of the landed gentry, who wanted to chase foxes for so-called 'sport'. Known as 'coverts', the local countryside is still dotted with these sites.

You might notice (you're not looking closely enough if you don't) some bloody awful-looking signs of attempting to clear dust marks. What on earth is going on here I do not know. They're not noticeable until I upload the photo.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2016, 05:56:09 pm by Chairman Bill »
Logged

Michael West

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1438
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1286 on: January 07, 2016, 11:36:28 pm »

In years past, hollows were made in fields, then planted with trees, to provide a suitable habitat for a fox to site its den. And all for the entertainment of the landed gentry, who wanted to chase foxes for so-called 'sport'. Known as 'coverts', the local countryside is still dotted with these sites.

You might notice (you're not looking closely enough if you don't) some bloody awful-looking signs of attempting to clear dust marks. What on earth is going on here I do not know. They're not noticeable until I upload the photo.

 You can see them because youve seen the image under other conditions.


I cant find..the dust spots. they may be embedded in the clouds which I could easily mistake for a part of the skys natural .."makeup".
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1287 on: January 08, 2016, 09:52:14 am »

I couldn't find them either. Perhaps they are "covert" dust spots (hiding behind the "covert.")

Nice image.

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1288 on: January 08, 2016, 10:41:51 am »

OK. Here they are

Michael West

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1438
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1289 on: January 08, 2016, 10:45:37 am »

OK. Here they are
Now they are apparent. I may be subconciously programmed to  try to ignore dust spots...
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1290 on: January 08, 2016, 03:43:46 pm »

Grafitti - Miami area

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1291 on: January 08, 2016, 03:46:03 pm »

Graffiti - Miami area

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1292 on: January 08, 2016, 04:54:21 pm »

Great set, Armand!

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1293 on: January 08, 2016, 09:23:07 pm »

Great set, Armand!

Thank you, these were targets of opportunity during a night walk (hence iso 6400 and/or F 1.4 on most). Quite a colorful area that was.

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1294 on: January 10, 2016, 07:20:02 pm »

.

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1295 on: January 11, 2016, 01:26:18 pm »

.

Michael West

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1438
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1296 on: January 11, 2016, 03:17:27 pm »

.
I see halos around the tree, but I like the photograph.
 
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1297 on: January 11, 2016, 03:49:54 pm »

Yeah, I noticed that. Some work to do.

Michael West

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1438
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1298 on: January 11, 2016, 04:30:16 pm »

Yeah, I noticed that. Some work to do.

Its nicely "evocative and worth the work.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1299 on: January 11, 2016, 05:36:39 pm »

Its nicely "evocative and worth the work.
I agree.


Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 137   Go Up