Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 572237 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #920 on: July 25, 2015, 08:07:03 am »

I illuminated this night bloom with an LED C-cell flashlight.

Lovely. Perhaps you could darken the very bright leaves on the right.

Jeremy
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #921 on: July 25, 2015, 11:06:03 am »

Lovely. Perhaps you could darken the very bright leaves on the right.

Jeremy

I hadn't thought of that. 

I may give it a try.

When the light is no longer coming from the lower right, maybe the flower will be the light source.

Bruce
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #922 on: July 26, 2015, 12:57:18 pm »

I saw it, and photographed it. I don't dislike it, in fact, I don't think it's too bad at all. I just can't work out why.

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #923 on: July 26, 2015, 01:05:06 pm »

When the light is no longer coming from the lower right, maybe the flower will be the light source.

Exactly.

Jeremy
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #924 on: July 26, 2015, 01:53:34 pm »

I saw it, and photographed it. I don't dislike it, in fact, I don't think it's too bad at all. I just can't work out why.

Because it looks good in gray scale too?

Bruce
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #925 on: July 26, 2015, 03:43:36 pm »

Bruce

I know I quite like it, in particular the play of light, but I suppose it's not the sort of subject I would normally photograph

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #926 on: July 26, 2015, 04:56:15 pm »

Bruce

I know I quite like it, in particular the play of light, but I suppose it's not the sort of subject I would normally photograph

Stacy says, that it is different, is a good enough reason to like it.

I say four alterations of light dark is a good number.  The composition works both deep or flat.  The railing protects us from the telescoped space colapsing back at us, discourages speeders, and seems readily surmountable should we dare proceed.  Our hero at the other end seems to be escaping in good order, which is more than I can say for my prospects with the hole I'm in.

Bruce
« Last Edit: July 26, 2015, 04:59:29 pm by Bruce Cox »
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #927 on: July 26, 2015, 05:22:22 pm »

Well at least Russ should like - the hand of man & all that jazz  :)

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #928 on: July 27, 2015, 06:03:35 pm »

A couple from Wimpole Hall.
Logged

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5248
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #929 on: August 03, 2015, 07:42:05 pm »

Like the sun.

Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #930 on: August 06, 2015, 05:38:53 am »

View from the flanks of Bow Fell, English Lake District

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #931 on: August 06, 2015, 09:37:18 am »

View from the flanks of Bow Fell, English Lake District
Very nice, Bill.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #932 on: August 06, 2015, 11:02:39 am »

Thanks, Eric

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #933 on: August 15, 2015, 11:43:32 am »

A few from Baddesley Clinton. An interesting historic house. National Trust: The volunteer guides are mostly OK but there are a couple of real PITAs lurking in amongst them.
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #934 on: August 21, 2015, 07:22:21 pm »

Exactly.

Jeremy

[See previous page]

I did move toward the general direction of your idea if not fallow it exactly.

Bruce
« Last Edit: August 21, 2015, 07:42:25 pm by Bruce Cox »
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #935 on: August 22, 2015, 04:04:58 am »

Really nice.

Now for mine - and yes, I know the highlights are a little bit blown in one of them  :)

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #936 on: August 22, 2015, 08:41:44 am »

Lovely scenes, Bill.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #937 on: August 22, 2015, 11:49:58 am »

[See previous page]

I did move toward the general direction of your idea if not fallow it exactly.


I don't like the crop: I think it's unnecessary and spoils the image. But it's your shot.

Jeremy
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #938 on: August 22, 2015, 12:23:55 pm »

I don't like the crop: I think it's unnecessary and spoils the image....

Jeremy, I will be reporting you to Rob, for a gross violation of his thread's original intention. You do not want Rob's wrath and locking of the thread! ;D

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #939 on: August 22, 2015, 12:54:46 pm »

Jeremy, I will be reporting you to Rob, for a gross violation of his thread's original intention. You do not want Rob's wrath and locking of the thread! ;D

Now now. Bruce was responding to a suggestion I'd made, so it would have been churlish not to have acknowledged him.

It'd be awfully nice to hear from Rob again, though.

Jeremy
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 137   Go Up