Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 572241 times)

WalterEG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #620 on: February 09, 2014, 02:40:17 am »

A variant on the water tower motif:

Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #621 on: February 09, 2014, 04:12:32 am »

A variant on the water tower motif:




When you blow this up - no pun etc. - you get the impression of an atomic explosion.

I don't think this theme would fly in Somerset, UK, these days...

;-)

Rob C

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #622 on: February 09, 2014, 04:25:05 am »

Her best work yet!

Were she not lying down (last time I saw her), I'm sure she'd give you a little curtsey, a tiny smile at the corner of her lips and her head bent down in modest tease. I believe her favourite author is Kathleen Winsor.

;-)

Rob C

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #623 on: February 18, 2014, 07:11:17 pm »

In the park

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #624 on: February 19, 2014, 03:48:29 pm »

One for Patricia, with thanks for an idea.

Rob C
« Last Edit: February 26, 2014, 04:48:25 pm by Rob C »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #625 on: February 19, 2014, 04:55:49 pm »

Love the red dot.

;-)


Studio flash backside! Knew it would come in useful one day. I wonder if you-know-who made it? Nah, probably not...

;-)

Rob C

WalterEG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #626 on: February 19, 2014, 05:03:17 pm »

I wonder if you-know-who made it? Nah, probably not...Rob C

Ay a guess:  Bowens.

Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #627 on: February 20, 2014, 04:13:53 am »

Any more bets on Bowen? I was actually attempting to tell Keith it 'probably' wasn't M territory...

;-)

Rob C
« Last Edit: February 20, 2014, 04:17:14 am by Rob C »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #628 on: February 20, 2014, 04:22:00 am »

The other one from the Chuck Berry music on Youtube that fuelled the 'Red Dot' session with Ms Coke.

Love that little 105mm; best second-hand deal I ever made - so far!

Rob C
« Last Edit: February 26, 2014, 04:48:42 pm by Rob C »
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #629 on: February 20, 2014, 12:22:41 pm »

I didn't expect her to wander into the red light district.
Another great shot, Rob. You should make a book with these. Title might be "Things go better with Miss Coke."
Maybe the soft drink giant would subsidize the project. I would certainly buy one.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #630 on: February 20, 2014, 03:07:47 pm »

I didn't expect her to wander into the red light district.
Another great shot, Rob. You should make a book with these. Title might be "Things go better with Miss Coke."
Maybe the soft drink giant would subsidize the project. I would certainly buy one.



Thanks, Eric; set up a petition and I'll do it if they'll do it!

Seriously, though, I'm thinking about it. I'd been worried about my eyes, what with glaucoma and all that, but when I went for my eye-test yesterday as prerequisite for renewal of my driving licence (three years between them - tests, not eyes) I was told I didn't need my recently-bought distance specs because the test result, run without wearing the specs, turned out quite okay... go figure. So, with driving now not an official problem, I'm rapidly running out of excuses for indolence.

;-)

Rob C
« Last Edit: February 20, 2014, 04:26:25 pm by Rob C »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #631 on: February 21, 2014, 10:03:20 am »

I think Coca Cola would be more interested in the concept rather than any specific images.

If they could persuade people to take images of coke bottles in their own environment, on their travels, in unusual situations... and then upload them to social media, well, it could well go viral.

Cheap and effective advertising.

Rob, rather than images, sell them the concept and make your fortune.



Can I copyright a concept?

;-)

Rob C
« Last Edit: February 21, 2014, 01:01:33 pm by Rob C »
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #632 on: February 21, 2014, 02:37:18 pm »

I have no idea what this is but I like it

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #633 on: February 23, 2014, 05:55:41 am »

Thirsty work.

Rob C
« Last Edit: March 03, 2014, 04:08:46 am by Rob C »
Logged

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 812
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #634 on: February 23, 2014, 12:30:45 pm »

Rural roadblock.

petermfiore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2705
    • Peter Fiore Fine Art
Studio Break
« Reply #635 on: February 23, 2014, 03:26:14 pm »

A studio break...


Peter
« Last Edit: February 23, 2014, 03:28:05 pm by petermfiore »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Studio Break
« Reply #636 on: February 24, 2014, 12:03:05 pm »

A studio break...


Peter


Funny thing: I just shot something vaguely (very vaguely!) similar at lunch yesterday, but it's last in the queue and I haven't yet poured it into the computer. For once it was a very sunny day and I had the pleasure of eating outside on the terrace, so the mind strayed to thoughts of snaps, and so I snapped. As I've more or less convinced myself of the folly of doing any more of my own kitchen art - I was going to write cooking, but that would be an exaggeration - it may be a long time before I have the experience again. The shot must serve as fond memory. If it works. If not, I'll forget it quickly.

;-)

Rob C

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #637 on: February 24, 2014, 03:50:56 pm »

Factory

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #638 on: February 24, 2014, 05:47:54 pm »

Well, Peter - rushed it through tonight on the energy from Jazz on a Summer's Day.

No ice in the fridge, not supposed to touch this stuff, but some days you just think screw it!

;-)

Rob C
« Last Edit: March 03, 2014, 05:06:48 pm by Rob C »
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #639 on: February 25, 2014, 04:02:54 am »

No ice in the fridge, not supposed to touch this stuff, but some days you just think screw it!

And quite right too. Good shot, Rob.

Jeremy
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 137   Go Up