Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 97   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 202151 times)

Rocco Penny

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 483
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #80 on: March 30, 2013, 01:52:10 PM »

and finally, without noticing, I've become a fan of cellphone vs Nikon
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14698
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #81 on: March 30, 2013, 02:13:05 PM »

also you must make sure you have the text sized at 100% for the photo to display correctly-
text size= picture zoom for you hard of hearing types



The text is at 100% - I just deleted the pic and then put it back, but nothing has changed. I'll go back into PS and see what it tells me...

Rob C

P.S. Everything at 100% but solves nothing.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2013, 02:31:27 PM by Rob C »
Logged

cmi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 492
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #82 on: March 30, 2013, 03:18:56 PM »

This is strange: all the shots made with the cellphone open on clicking as enlarged images in the original space below the post. This new camera shot, for some reason I don't grasp, doesn't do that: it opens up in a separate window... could that be because it's a bit larger than normal for me? If so, it's back to 600 pixels over the picture!

Yes from some pixelsize on it opens in a separate window, thats normal. I really like looking at your images by the way, and also the thread, its refreshing :)
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14698
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #83 on: March 30, 2013, 03:24:58 PM »

Yes from some pixelsize on it opens in a separate window, thats normal. I really like looking at your images by the way, and also the thread, its refreshing :)




Oh - I didn't know that size would affect the way an image is shown other than just the visible enlargement; I'll bear that in mind!

Glad you enjoy the pix; I think the thread is quite useful, too, if only because it saves a lot of argument.

;-)

Rob C

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8351
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #84 on: March 30, 2013, 04:06:50 PM »

You've got it, Rob. Now, start sizing these fine pictures 6 inches on the long side and they'll open in separate windows so we really can get a look at them.

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 705
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #85 on: April 02, 2013, 02:36:47 PM »

Been spending quite a bit of time in the sea lately, yesterday for the third time in as many weeks a wave broke over the camera- this time it was a bad one and the remote socket filled with water, causing the socket to short circuit. It happens now and again. Anyway, this photo was taken by the camera while I was manhandling the tripod to get it out of the water.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14698
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #86 on: April 02, 2013, 05:21:03 PM »

Been spending quite a bit of time in the sea lately, yesterday for the third time in as many weeks a wave broke over the camera- this time it was a bad one and the remote socket filled with water, causing the socket to short circuit. It happens now and again. Anyway, this photo was taken by the camera while I was manhandling the tripod to get it out of the water.



Which now puts an end to this nonsense that it isn't the camera that makes the pictures!

;-)

Rob C

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11184
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #87 on: April 02, 2013, 06:16:12 PM »

I love that photo, Riaan! Must have been expensive, though.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 705
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #88 on: April 04, 2013, 03:22:45 PM »

Haha Rob, maybe I need to try this more often..

Eric, the camera seems to have survived the ordeal, if it dies it's one of those things. Stuff ( and rogue waves) happen.
Logged

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #89 on: April 04, 2013, 05:47:54 PM »

I love that photo, Riaan! Must have been expensive, though.

Indeed, let form and light play!

JMR
Logged

cmi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 492
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #90 on: April 08, 2013, 06:10:14 PM »

Been spending quite a bit of time in the sea lately, yesterday for the third time in as many weeks a wave broke over the camera- this time it was a bad one and the remote socket filled with water, causing the socket to short circuit. It happens now and again. Anyway, this photo was taken by the camera while I was manhandling the tripod to get it out of the water.

..wich reminds me that sometimes I got excellent pictures by accidental snaps, not even looking through the finder. Sometimes too much thought can kill an image and often it is exactly the error, the unintended, wich leads to something beautiful and unexpected.
Logged

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #91 on: April 08, 2013, 09:14:49 PM »

Colour my world: that is the song that came to mind when I finally got to see and edit these.

JMR





Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14698
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #92 on: April 09, 2013, 04:36:30 AM »

The one in the middle is beautiful - love that blue!

For me, sharpness of a blur doesn't usually work, but in that blue one it works very nicely.

Rob C

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11184
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #93 on: April 09, 2013, 09:43:33 AM »

They're all nice, but I agree with Rob.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

Harald L

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 772
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #94 on: April 09, 2013, 11:03:24 AM »

Been spending quite a bit of time in the sea lately, yesterday for the third time in as many weeks a wave broke over the camera- this time it was a bad one and the remote socket filled with water, causing the socket to short circuit. It happens now and again. Anyway, this photo was taken by the camera while I was manhandling the tripod to get it out of the water.

Note to myself: Never buy used equipment from Riaan van Wyk.
Logged
Glad to be an amateur

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #95 on: April 09, 2013, 09:34:19 PM »

The one in the middle is beautiful - love that blue!

For me, sharpness of a blur doesn't usually work, but in that blue one it works very nicely.

Rob C
Thanks for the feedback, Rob and Eric. I didn't realize they were that sharp. A friend taught me a new way to sharpen images, so I tried it. But I see, perhaps he meant for projection purposes. I will have to revisit these, as I don't usually sharpen most of my motion technique images, except where appropriate.

JMR
Logged

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 705
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #96 on: April 10, 2013, 02:24:22 AM »

Note to myself: Never buy used equipment from Riaan van Wyk.

I wouldn't either! But then again, my stuff is old, I'd feel ashamed to even offer it for sale.

Logged

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 705
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #97 on: April 10, 2013, 02:28:23 AM »

Colour my world: that is the song that came to mind when I finally got to see and edit these.

JMR







Very nice as per usual John. I was in the garden this past weekend shooting butterflies and wondered about shooting something like this- you have given me the inspiration to at least try!
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11184
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #98 on: April 10, 2013, 08:56:15 AM »

I wouldn't either! But then again, my stuff is old, I'd feel ashamed to even offer it for sale.


Smetime late in the pre-digital era I realized that not one of the six or so cameras I then owned had been in manufacture for at least thirty years.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14698
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #99 on: April 10, 2013, 11:43:09 AM »

Smetime late in the pre-digital era I realized that not one of the six or so cameras I then owned had been in manufacture for at least thirty years.



Were you the happier man prior to, or post that Damascene moment?

Rob C
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 97   Go Up