Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 318119 times)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16585
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #640 on: February 25, 2014, 04:12:57 AM »

And quite right too. Good shot, Rob.

Jeremy


Thank you, Jeremy; I'd just like to add that my escapes from the strict regime are very few - I realise it's for my own survival and the reasons for keeping away from the effects of alcohol on the heart system have been explained to me and more or less understood - and regarding this shot, my wife would have been most upset that I had lunch out on the terrace and was too lazy even to set a cloth on the table!

But she did sometimes admit that were she living alone she'd probably not work as many culinary miracles as she did for the two of us; such miracles no longer exist. So perhaps that makes us sort of morally square? I love her, anyway.

;-)

Rob C

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2078
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #641 on: February 25, 2014, 02:53:48 PM »

Providence, RI

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2078
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #642 on: February 26, 2014, 07:54:57 PM »

South America, or maybe just Brazil

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2078
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #643 on: February 26, 2014, 09:15:39 PM »

.

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #644 on: February 27, 2014, 02:36:15 AM »

A couple of random finds/cell phone shots from today.

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16585
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #645 on: February 27, 2014, 04:07:27 AM »

A couple of random finds/cell phone shots from today.

Mike.



Though ultimately disappointing if you want to print large, cellpix are otherwise the best option because they are pretty much always possible to make.

And for personal fun, you don't need to print at all: the primary buzz is in the shooting, and a secondary one (buzz) might come along seeing it 'develop' in the dry dish of the monitor.

Rob C

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 592
    • BRATA
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #646 on: February 27, 2014, 08:28:30 AM »

Powerful protectors
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16585
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #647 on: February 27, 2014, 01:24:19 PM »

Now that really is an intriguing photograph.

Rob C

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #648 on: February 28, 2014, 01:54:59 PM »

Should have copyrighted your idea, Rob... too late now.  Don't know what Ms. Coke will have to say to the press about this obvious imposter.  :-\

http://blogs.adobe.com/photoshopdotcom/2014/02/what-its-like-to-be-a-world-tour-photographer-at-coca-cola.html

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16585
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #649 on: February 28, 2014, 02:30:32 PM »

Should have copyrighted your idea, Rob... too late now.  Don't know what Ms. Coke will have to say to the press about this obvious imposter.  :-\

http://blogs.adobe.com/photoshopdotcom/2014/02/what-its-like-to-be-a-world-tour-photographer-at-coca-cola.html

Mike.


Oh well, it was always going to happen, and doesn't matter to Ms Coke; she's above all that cheap publicity stuff. You know, the real thing, etc...

;-)

Rob C

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16585
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #650 on: March 01, 2014, 04:39:02 AM »

Things are not going well at the ranch; I mentioned the Coke impersonator to Ms C for the second time last evening, and she got quite cross: told me that I was getting too concerned about cheap wenches wearing parts of garish red paper dresses, and that it had better be the last time I mention such things.

Consequently, chastened, I thought I'd better go quite rapidly on to something else, and as the American West is somewhat distant - in fact, should you want to go there for some reason, then this wouldn't be a good place from which to start your journey - I decided to do a local, faith-based cover version instead.

Did the crusaders ever build churches in New Mexico or California? Probably not.

Rob C
« Last Edit: March 03, 2014, 05:07:10 PM by Rob C »
Logged

WalterEG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #651 on: March 01, 2014, 06:16:13 AM »

Ms C?  Not really discernible in this scenes.  Perhaps she lurks within the chapel flirting with other, possibly polished, identities in the cruet.

Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16585
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #652 on: March 01, 2014, 09:39:39 AM »

Ms C?  Not really discernible in this scenes.  Perhaps she lurks within the chapel flirting with other, possibly polished, identities in the cruet.




I've a deep suspicion that some distant relatives of hers are sitting on the tables in the distance; most everything else, apart from coffee, is too expensive for people who spend more than a couple of weeks here. I drink a lot of coffee, even though it's supposedly rationed for me too. However, having endured severe rationing during WW2, I feel I have a free ticket to ride.

;-)

Rob C

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2078
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #653 on: March 03, 2014, 11:21:47 AM »

Down we go

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2078
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #654 on: March 03, 2014, 03:24:59 PM »

Bench

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16585
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #655 on: March 03, 2014, 03:55:08 PM »

Down we go


Is the image a cynical reference to photographers?

;-)

Rob C

WalterEG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #656 on: March 03, 2014, 05:54:04 PM »

Geese are much more fortunate than photographers, Rob.  Geese have no shoulders for heavy bags of expensive kit.

Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2078
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #657 on: March 03, 2014, 09:03:38 PM »

I was getting more at the down that comes from geese

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2078
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #658 on: March 03, 2014, 09:54:03 PM »

Fall

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16585
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #659 on: March 04, 2014, 03:29:24 AM »

I was getting more at the down that comes from geese


If you knew that your goose was going to be cooked, wouldn't you feel at least a little bit down?

However, I was being generous and placing them a tiny bit further up the evolutionary scale and aligning them with the mythical properties of lemmings and the proven qualities of sheep.

;-)

Rob C
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 137   Go Up