Pages: 1 ... 100 101 [102] 103 104 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 574045 times)

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2020 on: October 16, 2016, 05:59:47 am »

And another from la manif...
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2021 on: October 16, 2016, 03:41:41 pm »

power lines

David Eckels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3528
  • It's just a camera.
    • Website
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2022 on: October 16, 2016, 03:50:20 pm »

power lines
I do like this Armand. I've seen shots like these but have never been able to bring it off like I think you have here. Love the lines.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2023 on: October 16, 2016, 07:55:24 pm »

I do like this Armand. I've seen shots like these but have never been able to bring it off like I think you have here. Love the lines.
What David said.
Surprisingly, it works!
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2024 on: October 17, 2016, 04:42:57 am »

power lines

Caught the light at just the right time :)
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2025 on: October 17, 2016, 04:50:12 am »

What David said.
Surprisingly, it works!


Yes, great graphic! Makes me think W. Eugene Smith.

Rob

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2026 on: October 17, 2016, 05:09:32 am »

A more cheerful, uplifting image from me this time:



;-)

Rob

David Eckels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3528
  • It's just a camera.
    • Website
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2027 on: October 17, 2016, 09:41:30 am »

+2 Rob ;)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2028 on: October 17, 2016, 10:39:35 am »

+2 Rob ;)

Ah, David, we just have to carry on...

;-)

Rob

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2029 on: October 17, 2016, 08:08:06 pm »

Thank you. While it is close to how I wanted it, I didn't think much of it which goes to say what I kind of knew already, I'm not good at all at self critique.

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2030 on: October 17, 2016, 08:21:12 pm »

road

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2031 on: October 18, 2016, 02:18:05 pm »

A classic theme...
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2032 on: October 18, 2016, 02:37:16 pm »


Yes, I appreciate the personal tease in the lost, loose ponytail shot...

Doisneau, however, tells me he feels the urge to sue. ;-)

Rob

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2033 on: October 19, 2016, 07:06:03 am »

I'm not good at all at self critique.

What's the purpose of self critique? If you are trying to sell the image, then you need to be able to see it though the eyes of a potential buyer.
If i's just to please you... it's more complicated. You like it or you don't but maybe you can understand what you like, what you don't like... not that you'll then be able to go out to make a photo with more A and less B... but tuck the information away in your subconscious.

Personally, when I read about someone struggling to get their print (or post-processing for the screen) "just right"... I kind of turn off. For me, post-processing can make a photo better, but it doesn't often seem to make something ordinary into something I love. That comes from content. So often, I don't see a photo in terms of "more this, less that"... but "oh, if that hadn't been there, if that had". In other words, the idea wasn't strong enough, it needed more. So the solution is to go out and take/make more photos based on my enhanced repertoire of ideas.

Which is one reason I don't submit photos for criticism: I'm sure there might be something to be gained from someone like Slobodan who is exceptional at spotting things that are "not quite right"... but the most important part is for me to internalise what works or doesn't, so that I get closer to taking the photos that I want to take.
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2034 on: October 19, 2016, 07:09:31 am »

Yes, I appreciate the personal tease in the lost, loose ponytail shot...

The pink people? No, he's attaching the string that holds her uni-corn!

As for Doisneau, there are so many kissing shots out there, it will be a while before he gets around to me ;)

Here's what the kissers were looking at:
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2035 on: October 19, 2016, 07:10:31 am »

When all else fails...


An unreasonably good last resort :)
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2036 on: October 19, 2016, 08:43:44 am »

So here's an experiment: the photo of the brass band, really badly processed. Big chunks of saturated black and blown out white.
Does it look as good as the previous version? No... but it seems to me that the impact is finally not so different. Which is to illustrate my point in the comment on Armand's photo, that I wasn't that hooked up with the idea of getting the perfect print: it is maybe the finishing 10% after you have content and framing.

In thumbnail size it probably looks better! Which leads to the question of how some photos demand different formats, some only come alive printed at 13x19, some are doing just fine at A4 and going bigger doesn't add anything.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2016, 08:47:23 am by GrahamBy »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2037 on: October 19, 2016, 11:17:52 am »

The pink people? No, he's attaching the string that holds her uni-corn!

As for Doisneau, there are so many kissing shots out there, it will be a while before he gets around to me ;)

Here's what the kissers were looking at:


No, the previous shot, Post 1016. The girl with her arm around the guy's back: her hair just up in a tail or a bun... reminder of my angst-missed shot of the girl that had reminded me of Leiter's back 'o head shot of his friend's daughter.

Rob

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2038 on: October 19, 2016, 03:43:23 pm »

Ok, I have a different image of your ponytail event now. I first thought you meant yours ;)
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2039 on: October 19, 2016, 04:02:54 pm »

Ok, I have a different image of your ponytail event now. I first thought you meant yours ;)

You flatterer, you! Mine's but a rat's tail; it never even saw a horse in anger.

Rob
Pages: 1 ... 100 101 [102] 103 104 ... 137   Go Up