Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 94   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 188313 times)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #160 on: May 18, 2013, 05:29:21 AM »

Beautiful!  Well worth the effort.

Mike.



Thanks - been a while since I used the Cat; decided that all that money 'invested' (a personal in-joke!) in lenses really had to be justified by competing with the moths.

Problem is, taking these bulky objects out means a bag, a tripod etc. etc. and the fun aspect rapidly diminishes as one goes along the not so merry way. Worse is the bad weather, because that means taking the camera off the 'pod and then popping it back on again instead of just carrying the whole thing as a single piece of thing.

Thanks again -

Rob C

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
    • pbase galleries
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #161 on: May 20, 2013, 09:01:34 AM »

Here is a scene that wants mowing.
Logged

Richowens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 900
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #162 on: May 20, 2013, 05:36:54 PM »





  Soap seller
« Last Edit: May 20, 2013, 05:38:36 PM by Richowens »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #163 on: May 21, 2013, 11:15:28 AM »

Okay, I like 6x6.

Unfortunately, this is 24mmx36mm and not even film...

Film would have given me the tones; this can't. I think I hate it more each day: a trading away of quality for convenience.

;-(

Rob C
« Last Edit: May 22, 2013, 04:17:34 AM by Rob C »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #164 on: May 21, 2013, 03:00:05 PM »

I like your version better than mine on the right cheek, but it makes it overall a bit more gloomy than I wanted it.

She's actually blonde -ish)...

;-)

Rob C


P.S. Where I find digital works least well (in this instance) is on the skin under the mouth: makes me think of porridge instead of skin.

P.P.S.  I'd rather folks would ask before using images; though within a general critique section, this thread/one isn't actually so.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2013, 03:13:57 PM by Rob C »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #165 on: May 22, 2013, 04:04:40 AM »

This is likely not what you were looking for, but as you say, it was convenient.

P.S.  I will presume approval is consent and that her left check is the right one. [See the fallowing]




No, approval of a change of look  is approval of an idea of how something might look; it is NOT approval of copying a work, especially one that carries an effing big COPYRIGHT declaration.

Please remove your infringement of my copyright.


Rob C

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #166 on: May 22, 2013, 09:40:46 AM »

Thank you, Bruce.

Rob C

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1764
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #167 on: May 22, 2013, 04:49:28 PM »

got a second look at these 2 oldies
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #168 on: May 23, 2013, 09:29:37 AM »

Warhol was only partly right - here's to the next fifteen minutes.

Doughnuts redux. Garnished with sand.

Rob C
« Last Edit: November 10, 2013, 05:12:55 PM by Rob C »
Logged

petermfiore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1110
    • Peter Fiore Fine Art
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #169 on: May 23, 2013, 09:40:13 AM »

Rob.

I LOVE THIS IMAGE!

Peter
Logged
www.peterfiore.com

Canvas Colors Brushes  

A life in Art >  www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRsNaNM0ZeU

Richowens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 900
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #170 on: May 23, 2013, 12:01:51 PM »

  Rob,

 WOW     You deserve a whole 24 hours for this one.

  Rich

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #171 on: May 23, 2013, 12:44:59 PM »

Thanks, folks; the series only happened because one of our erstwhile contributors from Germany, Chris Feldhaim, came calling and we went up the mountains to Lluch. I'd never gone to the monastery there before - just driven past it en route elsewhere further away... The place was quite interesting, so I returned later and shot some trees and stuff.

Rob C

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10968
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #172 on: May 23, 2013, 08:40:48 PM »

Excellent "stuff," Rob!

Eric M.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

Rocco Penny

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 483
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #173 on: May 23, 2013, 11:21:50 PM »

Warhol was only partly right - here's to the next fifteen minutes.

Doughnuts redux. Garnished with sand.

Rob C

bitchin' quite!
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #174 on: May 24, 2013, 04:44:55 AM »

Thanks again, folks, time to make another coffee (from a jar) and face the day.

;-)

Rob C

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 477
    • BRATA
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #175 on: May 24, 2013, 03:41:29 PM »

Last Sunday I took some pictures of mountains in West Grosina Valley, exactly from the Sperella Valley, above the Casera (Valtelline Valley).
Logged

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2324
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #176 on: May 24, 2013, 03:46:49 PM »

Nice tree, RobC.

Muntanela: all good, #2 especially.

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #177 on: May 25, 2013, 03:28:37 PM »

A very early D200 shot. For some reason Nikon Capture NX2 doesn't want to let me find any of my old NEFs folders, and I only have access to the one most recently used; very frustrating indeed. Fortunately this was also filed as a Photoshop file and out of the NX2's grip! However, I can't tell which optic was on the camera; I'd guess either the 24mm or 50mm.

Anyway, shot from the terrace one day as we were sitting having a pre-luncheon G&T. Strangely, I actually remember doing the shot. Those were the days.

Rob C
« Last Edit: November 10, 2013, 05:13:22 PM by Rob C »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14413
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #178 on: May 27, 2013, 11:47:38 AM »

For those with a little bit of memory for both film (Mickey Rourke) and music (Julie London).

http://youtu.be/jggh5bQAJaY

Rob C
« Last Edit: November 10, 2013, 05:13:55 PM by Rob C »
Logged

pegelli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 1021
    • http://pegelli.smugmug.com/
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #179 on: May 27, 2013, 03:58:55 PM »

The newest trend in photography, a rear-view mirror on your camera. I want one  :D

Logged
pieter, aka pegelli
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 94   Go Up