For example: Nice ambiguity, nice diagonals, very nice.
The discussion so far proves my point! There are those who appreciate detailed critiques and those who want a word limit of 6 or 25.
I, personally, would find Johnny's critique stunted in the sense it does not help me make successful images in the future. I would want to know why
there is "nice" ambiguity, why
there are "nice" diagonals and why
it's all "nice". Frankly, I am not much interested in "nice" pictures but my real point is that without knowing the whys, you cannot develop your skills.But
, I would not criticise him for his review and I would thank him.
What I cannot understand is why members who want short critiques want to attack and denigrate longer critiques. Someone has put a lot of effort into a longer review and they complain. How rude is that?
Why can they not just say "thank you" and move on? Why do they feel they have to criticise the review and, often, the reviewer?
All I would like to see is posters politely
responding to all
critiques. If you cannot do that, may I suggest you refrain from submitting images.