Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: World Press Photograph of 2013  (Read 2106 times)

Peter McLennan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1897
Re: World Press Photograph of 2013
« Reply #20 on: February 16, 2013, 02:20:55 PM »

These are difficult issues indeed, in The Golden Age of Photography.  : )

I agree with Slobodan that, if it's supposed to be journalism, then only the most basic of adjustments should be "allowed".
(but then who's doing "the allowing"  ?)

If, however the journalist's aim is to make a point, then surely he or she should be free to use whatever tools are available. Writers aren't so handcuffed.   Why should photographers be?

For us (and by "us", I refer to the highly photo-literate members here) excessive manipulation frequently detracts from the message. Certainly Iran's news organizations have suffered repeated ridicule from their inept photomanipoulations. But for the rest of the audience, photography's impact (and message, however distorted) frequently survives intact.  Is this fair?

I dunno.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8888
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: World Press Photograph of 2013
« Reply #21 on: February 16, 2013, 02:24:58 PM »

... If, however the journalist's aim is to make a point, then surely he or she should be free to use whatever tools are available. Writers aren't so handcuffed.   Why should photographers be?...

That's why I made the distinction between "news reporting" and "editorial story-telling." In the latter, the latitude is bigger. As Eugene Smith would illustrate (pardon the pun).
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up