Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Profile File Sizes - Why so Different?  (Read 1178 times)

dmerger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 680
Profile File Sizes - Why so Different?
« on: January 26, 2013, 03:17:44 pm »

I have about 50 profiles installed on my PC.  Some are .icc, some .icm, and a few other types. The file sizes range from 1KB to 1,637KB.  Why such a big difference?
Logged
Dean Erger

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Profile File Sizes - Why so Different?
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2013, 04:06:04 pm »

Color space profiles like Adobe RGB are quite small. Output profiles–depending on how there are made can be larger because they must contain multiple rendering intents and by-directional tables. Input profiles (scanners, cameras) are smaller although not as small as color space profiles. This is normal and to be expected...
Logged

dmerger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 680
Re: Profile File Sizes - Why so Different?
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2013, 05:05:07 pm »

That’s exacting what I’m seeing.  Thanks. 
Logged
Dean Erger

Scott Martin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1315
    • Onsight
Re: Profile File Sizes - Why so Different?
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2013, 07:32:19 pm »

There are simple matrix based profiles that contain just a few data points and then there are table based profiles that contain a bunch of tables full of data that more precisely define the irregular characteristics of a device and how conversions are to be handled for each intent. Table based profiles can be made in various resolutions (larger or smaller tables) which also effects file size...
Logged
Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com
Pages: [1]   Go Up