Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?  (Read 9772 times)

Jim Pascoe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 923
    • http://www.jimpascoe.co.uk
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #20 on: January 21, 2013, 06:22:03 AM »

Thanks from me too for the information Dan, and also for the link to the blog - which was very informative.  Now all I need is some money!

Jim
Logged

lowep

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 496
    • http://sites.google.com/site/peterlowefoto/
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #21 on: January 21, 2013, 06:33:12 AM »

So many options these days.  The mind begins to boggle.

just look for the biggest sensor for the smallest price :-/
Logged

Jim Pascoe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 923
    • http://www.jimpascoe.co.uk
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #22 on: January 21, 2013, 06:51:49 AM »

So many options these days.  The mind begins to boggle.

just look for the biggest sensor for the smallest price :-/

Unless you want the smallest camera at any price! :)
Logged

lowep

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 496
    • http://sites.google.com/site/peterlowefoto/
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #23 on: January 21, 2013, 07:17:15 AM »

thanks to Thanko price of the smallest camera may not be the limiting factor:



reduced to 5,980 円 here!

Logged

Jim Pascoe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 923
    • http://www.jimpascoe.co.uk
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #24 on: January 21, 2013, 09:06:56 AM »

Now that is small!
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 13221
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #25 on: January 21, 2013, 03:37:13 PM »

Wait till you count the angels dancing on the top!

Rob C

Markus Blaurock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #26 on: January 21, 2013, 06:06:16 PM »

There's also the Fuji cameras (X-Pro1/X-E1) to make your choices more complicated. If you use RAW or the recent C1 version I'd wager you get files that are at least as detailed as the NEX-7.
Logged

Jason Denning

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 234
    • http://www.jasondenning.co.uk
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2013, 04:22:48 AM »

The fuji options are tough because currently raw conversion is still lacking even with the new c1.  It's a tough call because what if thats as good as it gets?
Logged
www.jasondenning.co.uk


Fotoman 617 with Rodenstock 55mm, 90mm and 180mm lenses
Mamiya 645 Pro TL, and every lens mamiya made.
Sony A7 with 35mm and 55mm Primes

Markus Blaurock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: Sony RX1 worse than the NEX7?
« Reply #28 on: January 28, 2013, 06:18:54 PM »

Very true. I actually like the C1 raw output and as you also mentioned this might be as good as it'll get. That said I'd wager the images out of a good C1 conversion still hold up pretty well to a lot of other systems including the NEX.

Here's a full resolution shot out of the X-E1 (using an old 50mm Olympus lens):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marbla/8389753598/in/photostream
It's not an earth shattering shot but personally I find it gives quite a good amount of fine details.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up