Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: theft  (Read 808 times)

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
    • pbase galleries
theft
« on: November 05, 2012, 11:04:03 AM »

It seemed to me they should meet and compromise.

Bruce
Logged

Kirk Gittings

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1555
    • http://www.KirkGittings.com
Re: theft
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2012, 11:09:21 AM »

I don't get it.....
Logged
Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM
LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)

amolitor

  • Guest
Re: theft
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2012, 11:16:43 AM »

Not sure I do either.. Bruce has pasted together one of mine with one from seamus? Perhaps he seems a thematic connection?
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
    • pbase galleries
Re: theft
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2012, 11:52:14 AM »

Not sure I do either.. Bruce has pasted together one of mine with one from seamus? Perhaps he seems a thematic connection?


It had something to do with keeping fetishes in context, but I regret it already.  Also, I thought an option for changing the processing in you picture was to make it more like the higher contrast in Mr. Finn's.

Bruce  
Logged

amolitor

  • Guest
Re: theft
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2012, 12:17:51 PM »

Ah, thank you for the clarification ;) I promise I am not now, nor was I ever, offended.
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
    • pbase galleries
Re: theft
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2012, 01:01:02 PM »

OK, if that doesn't offend you, here is a higher contrast version.  I feel I need the practice at this kind of thing.

Bruce
Logged

amolitor

  • Guest
Re: theft
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2012, 01:02:48 PM »

That is actually quite a bit like it came out of the camera. As you can see you wind up with trouble on the face of the woman on the right, and you lose stuff in the shadows (I don't mind the latter, I do mind the former).

Still, I get that it's the "look" you're going for here, not the details. Thanks for pointing in a direction, here, I will noodle on it.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up