Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: UK landscapes  (Read 1633 times)

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5129
UK landscapes
« on: October 30, 2012, 04:28:37 AM »

Some nice stuff here.

Jeremy
Logged

Fips

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 195
    • some unrelated photos on flickr
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2012, 04:44:22 AM »

Thanks for the link. Makes me enjoy the coffee break I'm having a bit more.
By the way, the second image (Overall Young Photographer of the Year Winner) reminds me of this one from Michaels X100 review.
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8007
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2012, 05:09:11 AM »

Some nice stuff here.

Jeremy

Thanks for sharing.
Logged
Francois

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 7880
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2012, 10:52:42 AM »

#2 and #14 are "landscape?" I'd call both pretty good street photographs. There's some wonderful stuff in here, Jeremy. Thanks.

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2263
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2012, 12:32:51 PM »

Very nice. Thanks!

I am a little surprised by how processed some of these are. More so than we tend to see on this forum. Perhaps I'll start exercising my sliders a bit more.

WalterEG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2012, 04:43:14 PM »

Thank you Jeremy,

A most rewarding find that you share.

W
Logged

Justinr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1506
    • Ink+images
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2012, 07:19:21 PM »

Very nice. Thanks!

I am a little surprised by how processed some of these are. More so than we tend to see on this forum. Perhaps I'll start exercising my sliders a bit more.


No, please don't!  :)

You are right, they are over processed, they are made to look ideal and and allow for no flaws but as we know nature is never that way. There needs to a be a rough edge somewhere, something to suggest that they are rooted in reality rather than a still from a dream sequence. I found myself tiring of them due to the lack of imperfections.
Logged

john beardsworth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3606
    • http://www.beardsworth.co.uk
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2012, 03:37:52 AM »

Much as I like the winner, I thought this was an interesting comment on it http://www.alexnail.com/blog/news-updates/lpoty-2012/.   
« Last Edit: October 31, 2012, 04:19:02 AM by johnbeardy »
Logged

john beardsworth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3606
    • http://www.beardsworth.co.uk
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2012, 03:40:39 PM »

That winning photo has now been disqualified - see http://www.85mm.co.uk/blog/

This http://www.timparkin.co.uk/2012/10/landscape-photographer-of-the-year-2/ dissection of some of the compositing may also amuse / interest folk.

John

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2263
Re: UK landscapes
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2012, 02:33:18 PM »

Much as I like the winner, I thought this was an interesting comment on it http://www.alexnail.com/blog/news-updates/lpoty-2012/.   

On a happier note, Nail's own submissions (viewable via a link on the site above), are impressive.
Pages: [1]   Go Up