Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Which do you prefer?  (Read 2601 times)

leuallen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 312
Which do you prefer?
« on: October 20, 2012, 11:20:00 PM »

I am usually a nut for the 16:9 ratio if shooting a single frame or between 2:1 and 3:1 if doing a pano. This is for landscapes. However I think this image looks good in both 4:3 and 16:9. Which one do you prefer? I am curious to see if others prefer the 16:9 also.

A really great day in central Illinois for photography. Started with a great fog at sunrise and just shortly after this shot it turned crappy. Looked out the window near noon and it was great again - nice white clouds, blue shy and good sun. Got some good shots of the fall color which is really great this year. Went all the way until it was dark.

 E-M5 with 12-35 at 18mm, seven shot HDR.

Larry
Logged

JeffKohn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1670
    • http://jeffk-photo.typepad.com
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2012, 12:32:54 AM »

I prefer the 16:9, in this case I don't think the extra vertical space adds anything to the composition.

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2012, 02:07:31 AM »

I agree with Jeff... same reasons.


Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 7788
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2012, 04:32:30 AM »

Another vote for the wide aspect ratio version.
Logged
Francois

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9488
    • Echophoto
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2012, 04:47:02 AM »

Hi,

I'm with Jeff on this, too. My tendency is to crop sky a lot if there are no very good reason to keep it.

Best regards
Erik

I prefer the 16:9, in this case I don't think the extra vertical space adds anything to the composition.

Tony Jay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2527
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2012, 05:38:49 AM »

The 16:9 ratio has much more impact in this particular image.

My $0.02 worth

Tony Jay
« Last Edit: October 21, 2012, 05:43:11 AM by Tony Jay »
Logged

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2012, 08:11:33 AM »

For me...16:9 it says all that's to be said in a tighter package....nice shot well done.
Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com

Chris Calohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2426
  • Editing Allowed
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2012, 08:43:18 AM »

Wide-wide-wide...nice contrast range in the vaporous atmosphere.
Logged
What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1746
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2012, 09:59:15 AM »

Beautiful photograph in ideal conditions - well-captured!!

I prefer the 16:9 crop as well. The bit of sky showing above the structure provides all the atmospheric contrast you need, so the rest of the cloud and bit of sky near the top do not add to the dynamic of the scene.
Logged
Terry McDonald
Revealing the art inherent in nature - visit luxBorealis.com.
Have a read of my PhotoBlog and subscribe!

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 10132
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2012, 01:18:13 PM »

I'll go along with the herd if you are showing it as a single print.
However, if you are displaying it along with others, then I'd go with whichever version fits best with the rest of the show.

Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

james-greenland

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • James Greenland Photography
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2012, 01:43:13 PM »

I'll go along with the herd if you are showing it as a single print.
However, if you are displaying it along with others, then I'd go with whichever version fits best with the rest of the show.



valid point made here. It definitely pays to have the show look like a cohesive set... I'm also a fan of the 16:9. Looks like the decision has been made! ;)

leuallen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 312
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2012, 02:05:07 PM »

Quote
Beautiful photograph in ideal conditions - well-captured!!

I was lucky. Those conditions existed for only very few short moments. Before this exposure, the sun was not kicking into the ground fog and a couple of minutes latter the sun was hidden by the clouds above. It was dull blahsville following til about noon, then it got nice again.

It was a great photo day. I've posted three more from that day: late afternoon, late evening, and after sunset. I still have a hundred or so photos to process from that all day outing.

Larry
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 4145
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2012, 03:44:12 AM »

Cropping whether you do it in camera or on the computer is  - imo - an art in itself. I agree with the posters about the 16.9 and the poster who said that there wasn't any point in having empty space in the sky. I am surprised that Michael hasn't shown an article - if he has I can't remember - about the merits of cropping and some before and after images to prove the point.

jhoc

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
    • Nova Scotia Landscape Photography
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2012, 08:07:08 AM »

ANother vote for 16:9
Logged

Richowens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 873
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2012, 11:02:21 AM »

Stamper,

 Michael did write an article on croppping.

 http://luminous-landscape.com/essays/und-crop.shtml

 Rich

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 4145
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #15 on: October 23, 2012, 03:55:43 AM »

Thanks for the link.

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4872
Re: Which do you prefer?
« Reply #16 on: October 23, 2012, 02:43:33 PM »

I am surprised that Michael hasn't shown an article - if he has I can't remember - about the merits of cropping and some before and after images to prove the point.

He probably doesn't want to upset Russ.

Jeremy
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up