Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Plustek Opticfilm 120  (Read 31601 times)

EricWHiss

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2563
    • Rolleiflex USA
Re: Plustek Opticfilm 120
« Reply #60 on: February 15, 2013, 09:22:53 PM »

Its kind of interesting.  This thread is talking about the newest film scanner, while this thread is talking about using a camera instead of a scanner to digitize film.  http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=75024.0  Another recent thread also talked about using a camera instead of a scanner. So, maybe another question might be how close using a camera is to the Plustek (or any scanner)?
 

Based on the samples Bernhard has supplied, my feeling is my my 'scans' with my digital back and macro lens over a light table are at least that good, and most likely better than the plustek.  But I don't have just any digital back, I have a multishot back.  

Here's a 'scan' from my old Rollei TLR handheld with expired film someone gave me - 6x6 negs.  First the whole frame reduced and then a 100% crop.   Scan was achieved using an enlarging lens fit to the Rollei shutter adapter with the camera a 6008AF over a light table. 

« Last Edit: February 15, 2013, 09:26:09 PM by EricWHiss »
Logged
Authorized Rolleiflex Dealer:
Find product information, download user manuals, or purchase online - Rolleiflex USA

BernhardFuhry

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: Plustek Opticfilm 120
« Reply #61 on: February 16, 2013, 08:41:31 AM »

Logged

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Re: Plustek Opticfilm 120
« Reply #62 on: February 16, 2013, 09:54:06 AM »

Logged

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Re: Plustek Opticfilm 120
« Reply #63 on: February 17, 2013, 07:03:07 AM »

 It's better than the Eposon v750, but not as good as the scanners with AF like the Nikon 8000/9000, Microtek 120tf, Minolta 5400 etc.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up