Hi, I'm new to this forum
I have been into photography as a hobby for a couple of years now but I'm quite new to landscape photography. I am thinking about investing in a UWA lens and GND/Pol filters but I need your opinion on what you think would be a better choice.
1) Sigma 8-16 + Lucroit 8-16 adapter & Filter Holder + HiTech 165mm GND filters
+ 77mm Threaded Adapter Ring (for my Nikon 17-55)
Pros: Sigma is much much wider than the Nikon
Cons: The lucroit system is very expensive
2) Nikon 12-24 + 77mm Adapter Ring & Lee Filter Filter Holder + Lee Filters
Pros: Lee system is cheaper & easier to keep/manage 165mm vs 100mm
The filters and system would cost less
Weatherproofed
Cons: Not as wide as the 8mm
Is option 1 really worth the extra cost & inconvenience?
I've considered other lenses as well but weatherproofing might come in handy as I intend to bring it on trekking trips in the future.
I know the 8-16mm isn't weatherproof but I heard its built quite well but because its so wide I'm gonna close one eye and take the risk.
I've tried the nikon 10-24 but I don't feel comfortable using it because it feels very "plasticy". I agree that its an excellent lens in terms of IQ and build for others but its not for me.
Thanks!