Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Crossing At The Arches  (Read 3257 times)

DwayneOakes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 655
Crossing At The Arches
« on: July 22, 2012, 08:44:11 pm »

Thanks for taking a look !

-Nikon D7000/Nikkor 55-200mmVR/Nikon Capture NX2
-1/40 second @ f/16
-90mm
-ISO 400
-Ev -2/3
-Vr ON
-Active-D lighting set to HIGH

Take care,
Dwayne Oakes

Logged

tived

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 714
    • http://
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2012, 10:40:12 pm »

nice, but maybe add a bit more light on the deer

Henrik
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13769
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2012, 05:35:17 am »

Tunnel vision! Exquisite.
Logged
Francois

Tony Jay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2965
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2012, 06:00:10 am »

Nice!
Good to know that serendipity still exists.

Regards

Tony Jay
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2012, 06:30:37 am »

nice, but maybe add a bit more light on the deer

Henrik

The deer is in the shadows so more light would have looked false? As it is it is a fine scene and I can't fault it. ;)

tived

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 714
    • http://
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2012, 06:38:54 am »

Ohh, in that case it must be just fine, if you think it is.

However I didn't say to bring a sledgehammer to the party, but a gentle brush.
Anyway each to their own, the image have a lot going.

Henrik

The deer is in the shadows so more light would have looked false? As it is it is a fine scene and I can't fault it. ;)
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2012, 07:21:53 am »

Just giving my opinion. Nothing personal. A surprising response?

framah

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2012, 09:56:36 am »

I have to agree with Henrik.. You could nudge the shadows up a bit.  As he said not a sledgehammer but just a slight tap. As it is now,  it is a bit too dark in the shadows but overall a great shot.

Logged
"It took a  lifetime of suffering and personal sacrifice to develop my keen aesthetic sense."

DwayneOakes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 655
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2012, 03:44:08 pm »

Thank you very much for your comments and tips everyone ! 
I really appreciate it !

Take care,
Dwayne Oakes
Logged

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2012, 06:37:17 pm »

Beautiful image. You must have been really close.
Logged

jule

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 738
    • http://www.juliestephenson.net
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2012, 06:13:13 am »

I quite like the surprise of initially looking at the light green foliage...and THEN..SURPRISE  ...a deer!!!! If the deer was more obvious by making it a bit lighter - I may have not been so delighted by the surprise.

JUlie
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #11 on: August 04, 2012, 06:49:56 am »

I quite like the surprise of initially looking at the light green foliage...and THEN..SURPRISE  ...a deer!!!! If the deer was more obvious by making it a bit lighter - I may have not been so delighted by the surprise.

JUlie

+1
Logged

Justan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1928
    • Justan-Elk.com
Re: Crossing At The Arches
« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2012, 11:12:18 am »

It's a very enjoyable work. Did you publish this and the waterfall images here a year or two ago?

Pages: [1]   Go Up