i still wanna know which qatary person ordered the 1700mm lens and what did it cost him
If I remember correctly, a sheik visited the factory and asked for a lens to take pics of his flying falcons. Zeiss that said such a lens would be possible but not feasible as a unique copy. A few months later he made the payment together with other sheiks who also ordered the lens... It was ~2M$ each!
Seeing the pics from the Hasselblad facility makes me sad and angry! They build an entirely new HQ, ergonomic, nice workplaces making the best MF-cameras in the world! Then they killed it off by buying the cheapish plastic (yes, I know, the frame underneath is metal) Fuji and about 450 of 500 (~) highly-skilled employees in Gotenburg lost their jobs! They wouldn't even be able to make a 200 or 500 series camera anymore! They could have designed a wonderful new AF-system but not a Mamia 645-copy with central shutter... Argh, don't get me started! Mr. Hasselblad should have given the company to a foundation like Zeiss did...
Thanks FredBGG!
And what do you see from Zeiss production? They are too humble^^ (or too stupid to show off and point out differences to Cosina) I have experience with "international production networks" and despite much higher salaries, the core facilities are often operating cheaper because they're more efficient. Why they're offshoring production? Ask the very same people who ruin worldwide economy... The Cosina lenses are only cheaper because of lower quality-standards - the lens grinding, mechanics machining and assembly is certainly not slower or less efficient in Oberkochen/Jena...
Of course Master Primes are not feasible for photography but implementing this technology into a photographic line-up would be a great success - Investing 3k$-10k$ into a lens makes more sense than ever, IMHO.
Just as a comparison, while they're showing off the Cosina-made 15mm with halfway usable IQ near corners, they make the MP 12mm in Oberkochen/Jena with 90° horizontal angle of view and higher IQ @ f1.2 !!!