Thanks Scott,
yes, true, it's my shot .. but second opinions and critique here at LL is valuable and it often turns out there is something I've missed or overseen
. Sometimes you can stare yourself blind on a scene you (think) you know well. The scene in this shot is a place I visit regularly.
I am always impressed by the vibrancy of these flowers. They look a little green here. Perhaps you can bring out the yellow.
I agree - the Rape fields can be almost radiant yellow. In some of the surrounding areas where I live, Rape fields cover very large areas - it changes the landscape dramatically in spring.
I think the greenish tone might be due to the shadows and the fact that the Rape plants are not as concentrated in number in the dip on the field - maybe that's giving the green surroundings and foliage more visible impact.
The cloud bottoms look crooked to me, I would straighten them.
Maybe my english is worse than my photog skills - what do you mean by straighten the clouds? Crooked - how? Do you mean they look unnatural?
The clouds are overexposed in places, something to watch out for in the field. Perhaps they can still be retrieved.
Yes - I know one shouldn't blame the gear, but the photog behind the camera, when something is not optimal. But the 6mp D40 is probably not well suited for landscape shooting due to a limited dynamic range compared to current sensor technology. I probably sacrificed some of the clouds during PP to get more light in the foreground. Maybe that contributes to the crooked look(?). I'll try to manipulate the sky in Capture One to see if I can do it better.
I've attached the same scene without shadows from the clouds - the Rape has more vibrancy on these shots I think.
Lars