Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Peek-a-boo...I see you  (Read 1479 times)

sailronin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 335
    • David Reams Photography
Peek-a-boo...I see you
« on: May 18, 2012, 06:41:54 am »



Nikon D7000 w/Sigma 150-500 at 500
Logged
Thank you for looking, comments and critiques are always welcome.
Dave

http://sailronin.smugmug.com

Tony Jay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2965
Re: Peek-a-boo...I see you
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2012, 07:04:41 am »

A good try of a possibly difficult subject but with the subject being blurred and the palm frond the only thing in focus I am not sure that this works.

Don't give up though.

Regards

Tony Jay
Logged

bill t.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3011
    • http://www.unit16.net
Re: Peek-a-boo...I see you
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2012, 12:54:08 pm »

You should have set the camera up on a tripod and shot 50 focus brackets!   ;D

I think it works pretty well.  The eye is first attracted to the sharp leaves, then the de-emphasized tiger has a certain surprise quality, like he snuck up unnoticed.  Which is what tigers like to do.  It's a kind of "uh-oh" moment.  Or "sneaked," which is correct but kind of flat.

Logged

louoates

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
    • Lou Oates Photography
Re: Peek-a-boo...I see you
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2012, 01:23:08 pm »

Quite effective. Nicely done. Just the right focus emphasis for me.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Peek-a-boo...I see you
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2012, 01:57:05 pm »

Based on your signature, I took the liberty to suggest a possible variation on the theme:

sailronin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 335
    • David Reams Photography
Re: Peek-a-boo...I see you
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2012, 07:14:17 am »

Thank you Gentlemen,
Good comments and yes, the focal point is intentional.
Slobodan, wonderful interpretation, thank you.

Dave
Logged
Thank you for looking, comments and critiques are always welcome.
Dave

http://sailronin.smugmug.com
Pages: [1]   Go Up