Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Green, light and rain  (Read 3863 times)

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Green, light and rain
« on: May 15, 2012, 08:42:58 am »

combinations of the above

shutterpup

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 489
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2012, 10:49:13 am »

Are you and I related  ;)  I ask because our choices of photographic subjects are so similar  :)

I like the first 2 very much because of the arcs that dominate. Not wild about #3; no drama like the first two.
Logged

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 812
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2012, 01:24:27 pm »

Nice textures and lines in these Armand- have you tried a B&W conversion? The subject seems perfect for it. To me anyway.

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2012, 07:46:12 pm »

Are you and I related  ;)  I ask because our choices of photographic subjects are so similar  :)

I like the first 2 very much because of the arcs that dominate. Not wild about #3; no drama like the first two.

That I don't know but I'm sure I have soul mates out there (in photography that is)  :)


Nice textures and lines in these Armand- have you tried a B&W conversion? The subject seems perfect for it. To me anyway.
I'll try, it should work about the same. I really like that shade of green though.

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2012, 12:58:28 pm »

And here are 2 bw interpretations

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2012, 06:03:06 pm »

I like black&white #1 better.  I might like it even more if it were black, instead of brown.

Bruce
« Last Edit: May 27, 2012, 10:14:56 am by Bruce Cox »
Logged

shutterpup

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 489
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2012, 11:00:43 am »

I like bw#1 best. I don't know what Bruce is referring to about brown in #1?
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2012, 10:53:46 am »

I like bw#1 best. I don't know what Bruce is referring to about brown in #1?

Ok, I'm not the only one trying to find the brown  :)

amolitor

  • Guest
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #8 on: May 27, 2012, 12:08:53 pm »

Are y'all joking, or can you actually not see the toning?
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #9 on: May 27, 2012, 02:50:32 pm »

My old iMac is a bit crispy around the edges, but it has been pretty stable when I checked it every now and then with my Spyder 3 Pro [a calibration device from Datacolor].  It's loaned out, so I can't recheck right now.

Bruce
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #10 on: June 02, 2012, 01:23:34 pm »

It's not that much brown, more a subtle interplay between red and green but to satisfy the curiosity here are 2 versions with no toning.

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2012, 04:04:47 pm »

The contrast in v1 [and more so in v2] seems to be reduced compared to the toned version and I think it does not help.

Bruce
« Last Edit: June 02, 2012, 04:06:58 pm by Bruce Cox »
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2012, 06:48:34 pm »

The only difference between the first posted version and v1 is no toning. The perceived lack of contrast is the reason I chose the toned image in the first place. I can boost the contrast in v1 but I'm not sure it will help.

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2012, 09:55:22 am »

For the attached image I processed the toned version with CS5's black & white converter, tweaked the contrast in levels, and then brightened it some.

Bruce

P.S. to the one viewer before I remembered to sharpen: It is now sharpened
« Last Edit: June 03, 2012, 05:55:46 pm by Bruce Cox »
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2012, 10:20:01 am »

This B&W is derived from your color version after using "apply image, overlay" and levels first.

Bruce

P.S.  to the one viewer before I remembered to sharpen:  It is now sharpened.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2012, 05:57:04 pm by Bruce Cox »
Logged

shutterpup

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 489
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2012, 05:03:29 pm »

Finally, I see the brown tones to the original conversions from colors. Really like the crispness of Bruce's second one.
Logged

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: Green, light and rain
« Reply #16 on: June 03, 2012, 05:44:07 pm »

Much prefer the B&W v1 - exquisite.
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com
Pages: [1]   Go Up