Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: A Landscape  (Read 649 times)

amolitor

  • Guest
A Landscape
« on: May 11, 2012, 09:58:48 AM »

This is a photograph of a print, so the sky is slightly messed up. There was some glare which I edited "out" to a degree. That's what the weird more-or-less vertical streaky crap is. Anyways, this gives a fair idea of the print but is not as good as the print.

Logged

John R Smith

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1357
  • Still crazy, after all these years
Re: A Landscape
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2012, 01:41:13 PM »


So why did you take a photograph of a print?

(Rather than scanning the print - better idea - or scanning the negative and re-working it in LR or whatever - even better)

John
Logged
Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
and a case full of (very old) lenses and other bits

amolitor

  • Guest
Re: A Landscape
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2012, 01:56:50 PM »

Because I don't have a scanner.
Logged

John R Smith

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1357
  • Still crazy, after all these years
Re: A Landscape
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2012, 04:09:25 PM »


Well, I've got a scanner which works really well sitting on the desk beside me. It's part of an Epson all-in-one printer/scanner/copier, and it cost me all of 35 in my local supermarket. What I'm saying is, cost is not an issue . . .

John
Logged
Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
and a case full of (very old) lenses and other bits

James Billett

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16
    • Taunton Wedding Photographer
Re: A Landscape
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2012, 06:17:07 AM »

Looks to be a fair print - although it's very hard to tell when your looking at a photograph of a photograph :)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up