Subscribe for $1/month
Login
Videos
Luminous Landscape Home
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
April 26, 2024, 04:51:16 am
Home
Help
Search
Login (forum only)
Login (Subscriber)
Register
Luminous Landscape Home
Luminous Landscape Forum
>
The Art of Photography
>
User Critiques
>
A Landscape
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: A Landscape (Read 1018 times)
amolitor
Guest
A Landscape
«
on:
May 11, 2012, 09:58:48 am »
This is a photograph of a print, so the sky is slightly messed up. There was some glare which I edited "out" to a degree. That's what the weird more-or-less vertical streaky crap is. Anyways, this gives a fair idea of the print but is not as good as the print.
Logged
John R Smith
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1357
Still crazy, after all these years
Re: A Landscape
«
Reply #1 on:
May 11, 2012, 01:41:13 pm »
So why did you take a photograph of a
print
?
(Rather than
scanning
the print - better idea - or scanning the negative and re-working it in LR or whatever - even better)
John
Logged
Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
an
amolitor
Guest
Re: A Landscape
«
Reply #2 on:
May 11, 2012, 01:56:50 pm »
Because I don't have a scanner.
Logged
John R Smith
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1357
Still crazy, after all these years
Re: A Landscape
«
Reply #3 on:
May 11, 2012, 04:09:25 pm »
Well, I've got a scanner which works really well sitting on the desk beside me. It's part of an Epson all-in-one printer/scanner/copier, and it cost me all of £35 in my local supermarket. What I'm saying is, cost is not an issue . . .
John
Logged
Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
an
James Billett
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 16
Re: A Landscape
«
Reply #4 on:
May 12, 2012, 06:17:07 am »
Looks to be a fair print - although it's very hard to tell when your looking at a photograph of a photograph
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Luminous Landscape Forum
>
The Art of Photography
>
User Critiques
>
A Landscape
Loading...