Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Monkeys  (Read 4749 times)

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Monkeys
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2012, 09:22:06 am »

They're just monkeying around (but they call it "homo sapiensing around).
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Monkeys
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2012, 12:55:57 pm »

They're just monkeying around (but they call it "homo sapiensing around).



All you'd need now is for Trigger to jump in with all four feet hooves; that would be horsing around, which is rather more conventional. For horses, that is. Can you imagine a wet ape doing Lady Godiva? I mean imitating her, of course, on top of Trigger.

Rob C

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: Monkeys
« Reply #22 on: April 21, 2012, 04:16:49 am »

Actually, Rob, monkeys are not apes. They are a different species. But talking about improbable scenarios, can you imagine a monkey serving its apprenticeship as a Hair Stylist.

The lady in the photos below was lucky enough to be the model for such an apprentice, practicing for its future profession.  ;D

Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Monkeys
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2012, 05:25:11 am »

"Actually, Rob, monkeys are not apes."

This, Ray, is a well-known, fundmental fact.

However, if you wish to keep a sense of proportion between the species, you simply have to upgrade the scale of the more hairy ones. It's against nature to do otherwise.

Can you spot the one in this shot taken up the local mountain range yesterday?

;-)

Rob C

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: Monkeys
« Reply #24 on: April 21, 2012, 09:54:58 am »

Can you spot the one in this shot taken up the local mountain range yesterday?

Hardly! Is this supposed to be a semi-abstract shot? I find the bright vertical branch in the middle a bit disturbing. It divides the image in two. Shouldn't this be a reject?  ;)
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Monkeys
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2012, 12:56:43 pm »

I think it's actually a "where's Waldo" photo. I think Waldo is over to the right.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Monkeys
« Reply #26 on: April 21, 2012, 03:48:56 pm »

I think it's actually a "where's Waldo" photo. I think Waldo is over to the right.



Eric: you've found him! And he's more obvious if you keep the image small. For the less visioned, he occupies the middle half of the far right edge area, and has beautiful brown fur and fascinatingly vacant eyes...

Ray: the bright vertical branch is the subject, shadowy tree dweller notwithstanding. A bit of jarring's good for you.

Rob C
« Last Edit: April 21, 2012, 04:28:43 pm by Rob C »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up