Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Has high tech killed pro photography?  (Read 150773 times)

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3128
Has high tech killed pro photography?
« on: April 12, 2012, 12:04:15 PM »

BBC Radio 4  (6 minutes audio) Has high tech killed pro photography?
Logged

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2012, 05:37:05 AM »

Been building apace …
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14434
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2012, 08:37:06 AM »

Fings Ain't What They Used To Be.

Rob C

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2012, 08:42:07 AM »

Fings Ain't What They Used To Be.

Rob C

Don’tcha mean Wot, Rob?  ;D
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14434
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2012, 04:06:49 PM »

Don’tcha mean Wot, Rob?  ;D


Drat! I find slumming so difficult!

Rob C

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #5 on: April 15, 2012, 07:06:38 PM »

Drat! I find slumming so difficult!

Rob C

And throwing in the odd Guv provides a bit of additional verisimilitude …

 :D
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14434
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2012, 04:58:02 AM »

And throwing in the odd Guv provides a bit of additional verisimilitude …

 :D



Wotcha... No Bow Bells in Mallorca, mate, I'm struggling already!

Rob C

geesbert

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 626
    • http://www.randlkofer.com
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2012, 04:38:17 AM »

what language ar you guys talking?
Logged
-------------------------
WWW.RANDLKOFER.COM

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14434
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2012, 05:53:31 AM »

what language ar you guys talking?


English English.

Rob C

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2012, 07:05:20 AM »

what language ar you guys talking?

Bit a Cockney, guv, if ya know wot I mean …

Pays to be a citizen of The Commonwealf, to unnerstand, innit? (and being born around the middle of the twentieth century or earlier helps)

An I mus arsk, me old china, are you a Septic;D

Fings you gotta explain—gorblimey!
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2363
    • Website
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2012, 08:39:38 AM »

As one who was born within the sound of the Bells of Bow I feel I must protest at this clichéd and politically incorrect depiction of us Cockneys.

Yer all a load of merchant bankers.
 
Logged

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2012, 08:59:40 AM »

As one who was born within the sound of the Bells of Bow I feel I must protest at this clichéd and politically incorrect depiction of us Cockneys.

Yer all a load of merchant bankers.
 

Is that rhyming slang for *wankers*? [so, merchants then?]  ;D
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2012, 09:05:20 AM »

Born in South Australia in the ’50s to a father who liked his rhyming slang, I find the loss of it here, and elsewhere, to be a mournful thing.

Australian *yoof* increasingly obtain their *kulcha* from US sources, including the annoyingly-drawled Valley Girl accent. And we’ve pretty much lost our regional accents too.

Arrrrrrrgh!
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2363
    • Website
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #13 on: April 19, 2012, 09:18:57 AM »

Is that rhyming slang for *wankers*? [so, merchants then?]  ;D

Yup. I felt merchants rather than merchant bankers would be a little too abstract for the majority here.

Having been raised on a council estate by well spoken parents I can switch between BBC English and cockney or Sarf London English at will.
Logged

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #14 on: April 19, 2012, 09:25:04 AM »

Yup. I felt merchants rather than merchant bankers would be a little too abstract for the majority here.

Having been raised on a council estate by well spoken parents I can switch between BBC English and cockney or Sarf London English at will.

Sarf. Love it! Don’t know how the poms have managed to keep the cultural imperialism at bay, in the manner that we in Oz have conspicuously failed to do …

You may like this: chavs versus bogans.
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2363
    • Website
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #15 on: April 19, 2012, 09:31:45 AM »

I once met an Australian who was appalled that the British have first and second class postage.

I kid not!
Logged

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #16 on: April 19, 2012, 09:35:07 AM »

I once met an Australian who was appalled that the British have first and second class postage.

I kid not!

Well, that because we have no concept of class [cough].  Except for South Australia—we had no convict stain! ;)
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2363
    • Website
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #17 on: April 19, 2012, 09:41:54 AM »

Interesting article.

And to think I'd assumed that Australia was essentially a classless society!

As my wife says to assume makes an ass of u and me
Logged

mediumcool

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 724
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #18 on: April 19, 2012, 09:47:11 AM »

Class is everywhere! But Britain has had more time to get it properly stratified.

And the nouveau riche are looked down on too. Check out Rose Porteous. Hancock’s daughter is now one of the richest sheilahs [couldn’t resist] in the world.
Logged
FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool

jjj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4738
    • http://www.futtfuttfuttphotography.com
Re: Has high tech killed pro photography?
« Reply #19 on: April 19, 2012, 03:20:23 PM »

Born in South Australia in the ’50s to a father who liked his rhyming slang, I find the loss of it here, and elsewhere, to be a mournful thing.
You may like this;D
Logged
Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up